IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecolet/v261y2026ics0165176526000297.html

Corporate sustainability reporting directive impact on risk framing and commitment specificity: Evidence from EURO STOXX 50

Author

Listed:
  • Bax, Karoline
  • Paterlini, Sandra
  • Valentini, Odino

Abstract

This paper examines how the European Union’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) has altered the tone and credibility of corporate climate disclosures among EURO STOXX 50 firms. Using company sustainability reports from 2020 to 2024, we construct two textual indicators based on ClimateBERT and ClimateBERTCTI: (i) the Cheap Talk Index (CTI), which measures the prevalence of vague or aspirational language, and (ii) the Opportunity-Risk Index (OppRisk), which captures the balance between opportunity and risk framing (Bingler et al., 2024). Nonparametric comparisons of pre- and post-CSRD periods reveal a statistically significant rise in the CTI and decline in the OppRisk Index, indicating a shift toward increasingly more symbolic yet more risk-aware communication. These findings suggest that regulatory standardization may simultaneously encourage a riskier yet less opportunistic tone and incentivize more the use of generic, non-specific commitment language.

Suggested Citation

  • Bax, Karoline & Paterlini, Sandra & Valentini, Odino, 2026. "Corporate sustainability reporting directive impact on risk framing and commitment specificity: Evidence from EURO STOXX 50," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecolet:v:261:y:2026:i:c:s0165176526000297
    DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2026.112835
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165176526000297
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.econlet.2026.112835?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecolet:v:261:y:2026:i:c:s0165176526000297. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ecolet .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.