IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecolet/v247y2025ics0165176524006475.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The properness of weak stability notions

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Luosai

Abstract

Multiple weak stability notions have been proposed for two-sided matching problems, each based on a different perspective to justify the existence of certain blocking pairs. We introduce a criterion, called properness, to evaluate these weak stability notions. We say a notion of weak stability is proper if, whenever a matching is weakly stable, every matching that is more stable than it (admitting a subset of blocking pairs) is also weakly stable. We show that among existing notions of weak stability: the von Neumann and Morgenstern stable set, reasonable stability, α-equitability, partial stability, and the Tang-Zhang weak stability are proper, whereas the Klijn-Massó weak stability, essential stability, and priority-neutrality are not proper.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Luosai, 2025. "The properness of weak stability notions," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecolet:v:247:y:2025:i:c:s0165176524006475
    DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2024.112163
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165176524006475
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.econlet.2024.112163?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecolet:v:247:y:2025:i:c:s0165176524006475. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ecolet .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.