IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecolec/v69y2010i7p1368-1372.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bridging theories on environmental governance: Insights from free-market approaches and institutional ecological economics perspectives

Author

Listed:
  • Slavíková, Lenka
  • Kluvánková-Oravská, Tatiana
  • Jílková, Jirina

Abstract

Due to methodological problems and their practical limitations, the criticism of neoclassical environmental economics is increasing. The goal of this paper is to stress the differences and similarities between the two competing alternative approaches - institutional ecological economics and free-market approaches to environmental protection - to encourage their interactions towards a possible synthesis in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Slavíková, Lenka & Kluvánková-Oravská, Tatiana & Jílková, Jirina, 2010. "Bridging theories on environmental governance: Insights from free-market approaches and institutional ecological economics perspectives," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(7), pages 1368-1372, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:69:y:2010:i:7:p:1368-1372
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921-8009(10)00052-2
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    RePEc Biblio mentions

    As found on the RePEc Biblio, the curated bibliography for Economics:
    1. > Schools of Economic Thought, Epistemology of Economics > Heterodox Approaches > Ecological Economics > Institutions and the Environment

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gendron, Corinne, 2014. "Beyond environmental and ecological economics: Proposal for an economic sociology of the environment," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 240-253.
    2. Ana Iolanda Voda & Catalin Chiriac, 2012. "An inexhaustive criticism of the standard economic theory from an Austrian perspective related to growth and development," Review of Applied Socio-Economic Research, Pro Global Science Association, vol. 3(1), pages 195-202, July.
    3. Qianwen Wu & Qiangqiang Wang & Yongwu Dai, 2023. "Analysis of Strategy Selection in Third-Party Governance of Rural Environmental Pollution," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-19, May.
    4. Van Hecken, Gert & Bastiaensen, Johan & Windey, Catherine, 2015. "Towards a power-sensitive and socially-informed analysis of payments for ecosystem services (PES): Addressing the gaps in the current debate," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 117-125.
    5. Lenka Slavikova, 2013. "From Cost-Benefit to Institutional Analysis in The Economics of the Environment," Contemporary Economics, University of Economics and Human Sciences in Warsaw., vol. 7(2), June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:69:y:2010:i:7:p:1368-1372. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ecolecon .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.