Author
Listed:
- Abbas, Syeda Aimen
- Kopp, Thomas
Abstract
Environmental deterioration has become a central policy concern, reflected in initiatives such as the European Green Deal, which aim to steer European economies toward low-carbon development. While this transition is environmentally necessary, it may also generate uneven social and economic consequences. This study examines the distributional effects of environmental policy adoption and stringency in 26 European OECD countries over the period 1990–2022. Climate policy stringency is measured using the OECD's Climate Actions and Policies Measurement Framework (CAPMF), and income inequality is captured through three indicators: pre-tax national income Gini, disposable income Gini, and post-tax national income Gini. These measures allow assessment of inequality at different stages of the redistribution process. The analysis employs the Augmented Mean Group (AMG) estimator, which is suited to the panel's characteristics of slope heterogeneity, cross-sectional dependence, and potential endogeneity. The results show that greater climate policy stringency is associated with higher pre-tax and post-tax income inequality, suggesting that the costs of climate policy may fall disproportionately on lower-income groups. By contrast, the effect on disposable income inequality is not statistically significant, indicating that taxes and direct cash transfers can mitigate these adverse distributional effects. At the same time, the persistence of a positive association for post-tax inequality suggests that broader redistributive mechanisms, including in-kind transfers, do not fully offset them. These findings are robust across alternative specifications and estimators. Overall, the results suggest that a just green transition requires not only ambitious environmental policy, but also well-targeted redistributive measures to prevent inequality from widening.
Suggested Citation
Abbas, Syeda Aimen & Kopp, Thomas, 2026.
"The distributional impact of climate policy stringency in the European Union,"
Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:249:y:2026:i:c:s092180092600203x
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2026.109118
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:249:y:2026:i:c:s092180092600203x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ecolecon .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.