IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecolec/v248y2026ics0921800926001710.html

Is tax aversion dominant? A survey experiment on combining energy taxes and subsidies

Author

Listed:
  • Kallbekken, Steffen
  • Skjeflo, Sofie Waage
  • Rosendahl, Knut Einar

Abstract

This study investigates the behavioral underpinnings of public support for environmental policy packages combining taxes and subsidies. Using a survey experiment with fractional combinations of these instruments, designed to achieve equivalent reductions in negative externalities, we examine how the public evaluates policy combinations. Our results reveal that, while support for combined policies falls between tax-only and subsidy-only levels, they are closer to tax-only support. This asymmetry is consistent with loss aversion and negativity dominance: in the public's evaluation of policies, taxes appear to weigh more heavily than equivalent subsidies. The effect is particularly pronounced in concerns about financial impacts on low-income households. Our findings indicate that combining unpopular taxes with favorable subsidies may not significantly increase public support, contrary to some theories of policy packaging. Particular attention should be paid to addressing concerns about negative financial impacts on low-income households when designing policy packages that include taxes.

Suggested Citation

  • Kallbekken, Steffen & Skjeflo, Sofie Waage & Rosendahl, Knut Einar, 2026. "Is tax aversion dominant? A survey experiment on combining energy taxes and subsidies," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:248:y:2026:i:c:s0921800926001710
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2026.109086
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800926001710
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2026.109086?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:248:y:2026:i:c:s0921800926001710. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ecolecon .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.