Author
Listed:
- Heinz, Erin
- Sovacool, Benjamin K.
- Kwan, Thomas
- Nordensvärd, Johan
- Urban, Frauke
- Asif, Muhammad
- Zhang, Weimin
- Thollander, Patrik
- Rohdin, Patrik
- Arvidsson, Niklas
Abstract
Residential or household energy use in heating, cooling, and lighting must become more efficient to advance residential decarbonization and meet 2050 global climate targets. This study presents a typology of social impacts and behaviors, emphasizing normative community roles in decarbonization of residential buildings. We examine efficiency-related behaviors in the private sphere including lighting, air-conditioning use, and building upgrades using a nationally representative United States dataset (n = 1002). We analyze social encouragement from friends, family, and workplace. OLS analyses show that these social normative pressures significantly predict ongoing energy-efficiency behaviors, including both developing behaviors (i.e. managing air conditioning, β = 0.220, p < .001) and habitual behaviors (i.e. turning off lights, β = 0.163, p < .001). Logit models further indicate that social influence significantly increases the likelihood of one-off efficiency upgrades in the home (b = 0.336, p < .001). Results additionally distinguish three behavioral profiles characterized by differing levels of awareness of emissions and energy issues and varying degrees of peer influence. Across profiles, contextual factors such as awareness and social encouragement outweigh demographic predictors and independently shape efficiency behaviors. These findings substantiate the importance of social context in household energy management. We conclude with policy recommendations.
Suggested Citation
Heinz, Erin & Sovacool, Benjamin K. & Kwan, Thomas & Nordensvärd, Johan & Urban, Frauke & Asif, Muhammad & Zhang, Weimin & Thollander, Patrik & Rohdin, Patrik & Arvidsson, Niklas, 2026.
"Towards a typology of residential energy consumers: Social context and awareness as predictors of energy-efficient household behaviors in the United States,"
Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:248:y:2026:i:c:s0921800926001436
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2026.109058
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:248:y:2026:i:c:s0921800926001436. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ecolecon .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.