Author
Listed:
- Bausano, Giovanni
- Masiero, Mauro
- Rougieux, Paul
- Kilsedar, Candan Eylül
- Pettenella, Davide
- Patani, Selene
- Mubareka, Sarah
- Migliavacca, Mirco
Abstract
The European Union (EU) vegetable oils market embodies global environmental impacts. The EU Regulation on deforestation-free products, which aims to halt deforestation embodied in commodity supply chains, underscores the need to assess the relative ecological consequences of different oil crop alternatives. Using a mixed-methods approach, this study evaluates conservation trade-offs associated with soybeans, oil palm fruit, rapeseed, and sunflower seed production across biodiversity, carbon, and water in 42 supplier countries to the EU-27 market. Between 2000 and 2020, the EU-27, representing about 6% of the global population, accounted for an average of 15% of the global agricultural land use dedicated to the selected crops. Although impacts varied substantially across countries and crops, oil palm plantations, despite their comparatively low land footprint per unit of oil, are largely located in areas of high conservation priority relative to alternative crops. Our analysis further suggests that Thailand, Great Britain, the United States of America, and Hungary might represent the most environmentally friendly sourcing options for oil palm fruit, rapeseed, soybeans, and sunflower seed respectively. These findings highlight the importance of identifying a diversified and ecologically informed sourcing basket (i.e., portfolio) of products to support EU policy development on sustainable sourcing and minimize unintended environmental trade-offs beyond deforestation and impacts on forest ecosystems.
Suggested Citation
Bausano, Giovanni & Masiero, Mauro & Rougieux, Paul & Kilsedar, Candan Eylül & Pettenella, Davide & Patani, Selene & Mubareka, Sarah & Migliavacca, Mirco, 2026.
"A sustainable basket of vegetable oils for the European Union: Conservation trade-offs among consumption alternatives in the context of the EU deforestation regulation,"
Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:247:y:2026:i:c:s0921800926001412
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2026.109056
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:247:y:2026:i:c:s0921800926001412. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ecolecon .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.