IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecolec/v247y2026ics0921800926001345.html

Economic inequality is linked to citizens viewing individuals as more responsible for climate change mitigation than governments

Author

Listed:
  • Klebl, Christoph
  • Jetten, Jolanda
  • Kirkland, Kelly

Abstract

As global support for climate action grows, the debate has shifted to who bears primary responsibility for climate change mitigation: individuals or systemic actors like governments. The present study (N = 76,288; 72 countries) examined whether national economic inequality, measured by the World Bank Gini index, is associated with citizens' views on who is responsible for climate change mitigation. Using cross-national survey data collected in early 2022, multilevel analyses showed that citizens living in nations with greater (vs. lower) levels of economic inequality were more likely to attribute responsibility for climate change mitigation to individual people rather than to governments (and businesses). This association remained after controlling for GDP per capita, individuals' belief in and perceived importance of climate change, and demographic factors. One possible explanation for these findings is that economic inequality may erode public trust, leading individuals to lose faith in the ability of governments and other institutions to implement effective systemic change. The findings suggest that citizens in more unequal societies may be less likely to expect or demand ambitious government-led climate policies, potentially making systemic action harder to achieve. Addressing inequality therefore may help shift public views toward recognising government responsibility for mitigating climate change.

Suggested Citation

  • Klebl, Christoph & Jetten, Jolanda & Kirkland, Kelly, 2026. "Economic inequality is linked to citizens viewing individuals as more responsible for climate change mitigation than governments," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:247:y:2026:i:c:s0921800926001345
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2026.109049
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800926001345
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2026.109049?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:247:y:2026:i:c:s0921800926001345. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ecolecon .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.