IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecolec/v247y2026ics0921800926001266.html

A typology of European farmers' viewpoints on soil management and an investigation of their context-dependency

Author

Listed:
  • Leonhardt, Heidi
  • Braito, Michael
  • Bütikofer, Nicole
  • Graversgaard, Morten
  • Hacek, Marion
  • Höckert, Jenny
  • Lunar-Koch, Ernesto
  • Lundström, Christina
  • Schreiber, Mariella
  • Tiselius, Mette

Abstract

Fostering the uptake of sustainable soil management practices requires a good understanding of farmers' motivations and priorities. To comprehensively assess these priorities, we identify and describe archetypical viewpoints on soil management among European crop farmers. We analyse interviews conducted with 132 farmers from five case study regions using Q-Methodology, a mixed quantitative and qualitative method. In addition, we apply and compare three different approaches to Q-Methodology and investigate the context-dependency of the identified viewpoints. Our results demonstrate the existence of up to five archetypical viewpoints on soil management. They are distinct in their focus on soil health, farm economics, social sustainability, traditional farming values, and risk avoidance, respectively. We find that these viewpoints are partly—but by no means fully—context-dependent. This implies that farmers' needs do not only vary due to natural farming conditions or farm structural aspects, but also due to subjective worldviews. Knowledge about archetypical viewpoints can help policy makers and advisory services to support farmers in a tailored manner.

Suggested Citation

  • Leonhardt, Heidi & Braito, Michael & Bütikofer, Nicole & Graversgaard, Morten & Hacek, Marion & Höckert, Jenny & Lunar-Koch, Ernesto & Lundström, Christina & Schreiber, Mariella & Tiselius, Mette, 2026. "A typology of European farmers' viewpoints on soil management and an investigation of their context-dependency," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:247:y:2026:i:c:s0921800926001266
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2026.109041
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800926001266
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2026.109041?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:247:y:2026:i:c:s0921800926001266. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ecolecon .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.