Author
Listed:
- Castro, Damaris
- Bleys, Brent
Abstract
The notion of sufficiency has gained considerable traction over the past decades due to its benefits for environmental sustainability, well-being, and socio-ecological justice. However, little is known about societal readiness for sufficiency. In this article we develop single-item and aggregate measures of subjective sufficiency in the material domain, combining two dimensions: enoughness (“on a material level, I feel that I have enough”) and aspiration (“on a material level, I would like to have more than I currently have”). Using Flemish survey data from 2020 (N = 1623), we address four research objectives: assessing the prevalence and methodological validity of the developed measures, exploring socio-demographic and personality characteristics associated with subjective sufficiency, and examining its relationship with life satisfaction and subjective income sufficiency. We find that aspiration plays a critical role in shaping aggregate sufficiency measures, and that most of the population experiences subjective sufficiency, with prevalence ranging from 55% to 71% depending on the measure. Moreover, the experience of sufficiency is more common among women, homeowners, high earners, homemakers, and conscientious individuals, follows a nonlinear age pattern and is less common among materialistic individuals. A four-group typology demonstrates that single-dimension approaches misclassify 24.1% of respondents. Subjective sufficiency is positively associated with both life satisfaction and subjective income sufficiency. The measures developed in this study provide valuable tools for gauging subjective sufficiency experiences, which could offer insights into psychological preconditions for sufficiency practices. Ultimately, our findings guide policymakers with tools to identify population segments differing in their readiness for sufficiency transitions.
Suggested Citation
Castro, Damaris & Bleys, Brent, 2026.
"“Having enough” is not enough: The value of “wanting more” in subjective sufficiency measures,"
Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:247:y:2026:i:c:s0921800926001199
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2026.109034
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:247:y:2026:i:c:s0921800926001199. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ecolecon .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.