IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecolec/v243y2026ics0921800925003969.html

Impact of sustainable land management on household resilience gaps: Evidence from China's marginalized farmers

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Fangyi
  • Zhou, Lihua

Abstract

With global land degradation worsening, sustainable land management practices (SLMPs, including applying organic fertilizer and mulching) have been widely promoted to enhance agricultural productivity, reduce income risks, and foster social peace. Using survey data from 1807 farming households in China, this study employs a multinomial endogenous switching regression (MESR) model to examine the adoption of different SLMPs and their effects on economic resilience (ER, measured by log household income) and comprehensive resilience (CR, a composite index constructed by incorporating absorptive, self-organizing, and learning capacities). The results reveal that adoption of soil fertility improvement (SFI) significantly reduces ER by 22.80 %, whereas adoption of soil conservation and ecocycle practices (SCE) and joint adoption of SFI and SCE significantly enhance it. In contrast, all adoption strategies significantly improve farmers' CR, with joint adoption generating the largest gains. Heterogeneity analysis further reveals that, compared to non-adopters, joint adoption significantly reduces the gender-based ER gap (measured by the difference in resilience between marginalized and reference groups under each adoption scenario) from 2.966 to 1.143, and reduces regional resilience gap, whereas it widens the resilience gap between small- and large-scale farmers. These findings highlight the importance of SLMPs policies that prioritize marginalized groups, particularly women, farmers in less-developed regions, and smallholders, to promote resilience equity in developing countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Fangyi & Zhou, Lihua, 2026. "Impact of sustainable land management on household resilience gaps: Evidence from China's marginalized farmers," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:243:y:2026:i:c:s0921800925003969
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108913
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800925003969
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108913?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:243:y:2026:i:c:s0921800925003969. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ecolecon .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.