Author
Listed:
- Grabow, Simon
- Laa, Elisabeth
- MacLean, Jasmine
- Reynolds, Christian
- Bruckner, Martin
Abstract
Germany's dietary patterns are among the most environmentally intensive in the world. In light of the multitude of environmental pressures originating from the current food system, we scrutinise the carbon, land, blue and green water foodprints of German consumers, distinguishing between two subgroups of interest: gender and socio-economic status. Using the multi-regional Food and Agriculture Biomass Input-Output model we are able to capture emissions throughout dispersed global supply chains. For allocating environmental responsibilities to the respective subgroups, we rely on the largest study to record eating habits and beverage consumption in Germany: the National Nutrition Study II. For male consumers, land requirements, carbon emissions and green water foodprints decline with increasing socio-economic status. Among females, differences in carbon, land, and green water foodprints across socio-economic strata are relatively minor and lack a consistent pattern. We identify meat and dairy product consumption to be the largest contributor to environmental foodprints, accounting for up to two-thirds of overall carbon emissions, land requirements and green water use. Notably, blue water use is highest among high socio-economic status females and males, largely driven by greater consumption of blue water-intensive foods such as nuts and seeds and fruits, vegetables, and legumes. Our results carry important policy implications, highlighting that prominent push measures – such as extending the Emissions Trading Scheme to the agricultural sector or introducing a meat tax – may have disproportionate adverse effects on households of low socio-economic status.
Suggested Citation
Grabow, Simon & Laa, Elisabeth & MacLean, Jasmine & Reynolds, Christian & Bruckner, Martin, 2026.
"Environmental footprints of German food consumption by gender and socio-economic status,"
Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:243:y:2026:i:c:s092180092500391x
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108908
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:243:y:2026:i:c:s092180092500391x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ecolecon .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.