Author
Listed:
- Liu, Juan
- Li, Jingmei
- Shan, Jingzhu
- Li, Shuqin
Abstract
Oil spills result in significant damage to marine ecosystems, with monetary compensation and ecological restoration serving as the primary mechanisms for environmental damage remediation. This study examines the 2021 A Symphony tanker collision in the Qingdao coastal waters as a case study, comparing the outcomes of two environmental damage assessment methods: the Contingent Valuation Method (CVM) for estimating monetary compensation and Habitat Equivalency Analysis (HEA) for assessing ecological restoration. The study also explores the applicability and implementation conditions of these two approaches. The findings show that, using the CVM, the average willingness to pay for oil spill prevention programs was estimated at 192.30 Chinese Yuan (CNY) per household, leading to an inferred ecological damage value of 697 million CNY. In contrast, HEA estimates the cost of restoring damaged marine habitat services to be between 441 million and 660 million CNY. The CVM results were approximately 5.61 % higher than the upper limit and 58.05 % higher than the lower limit of the HEA estimates. Monetary compensation ensures that public environmental welfare remains unaffected, making it suitable for cases where liability is clear and the damage is irreversible. Ecological restoration, in turn, aims to maintain marine ecosystem functions at baseline levels, making it appropriate for scenarios where the damage is primarily ecological and restoration technologies are feasible. This study provides valuable insights for the ecological damage assessment of oil spills and the formulation of environmental remediation policies.
Suggested Citation
Liu, Juan & Li, Jingmei & Shan, Jingzhu & Li, Shuqin, 2026.
"Ecological damage compensation in oil spills: A comparative analysis of monetary valuation and ecological restoration based on the 2021 A Symphony incident,"
Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:242:y:2026:i:c:s0921800925003829
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108899
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:242:y:2026:i:c:s0921800925003829. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ecolecon .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.