IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecolec/v240y2026ics092180092500326x.html

Resource regimes and the success of local renewable energy projects

Author

Listed:
  • Viallon, François-Xavier
  • Sarti, Francesco
  • Bombenger, Pierre-Henri
  • Varone, Frédéric
  • Trein, Josef Philipp
  • Kodjovi, Marie-Joëlle
  • Dubois, Jérôme
  • Fournis, Yann
  • Pineau, Pierre-Olivier

Abstract

While national governments and parliaments adopt policies to speed up the development of renewable energies, the local implementation of renewable energy projects often faces economic, ecological, and social challenges. The existing literature primarily focuses on conditions which foster local acceptance and policy integration to explain the (non-)realization of renewable energy projects. In contrast, property rights have not yet been explicitly considered as conditions. This study applies the institutional resource regime approach to investigate the joint impact of property rights and public policies on the local implementation of renewable energy projects. Drawing on a comparison of twelve cases which encompass solar, wind, biomass, and geothermal energy projects in three countries, the results show the importance of property rights within the project area, and the insufficiency of public policies alone to facilitate successful renewable energy projects. More specifically, public landownership and revenue sharing increase the chances of project success, as this entails the involvement of local democratic institutions and supports the resilience of project promotors against political contestation.

Suggested Citation

  • Viallon, François-Xavier & Sarti, Francesco & Bombenger, Pierre-Henri & Varone, Frédéric & Trein, Josef Philipp & Kodjovi, Marie-Joëlle & Dubois, Jérôme & Fournis, Yann & Pineau, Pierre-Olivier, 2026. "Resource regimes and the success of local renewable energy projects," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:240:y:2026:i:c:s092180092500326x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108843
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092180092500326X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108843?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Terry van Dijk & Arno van der Vlist, 2015. "On the interaction between landownership and regional designs for land development," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(10), pages 1899-1914, August.
    2. Guillermo M. Cejudo & Philipp Trein, 2023. "Pathways to policy integration: a subsystem approach," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 56(1), pages 9-27, March.
    3. Ioana-Elena Oana & Carsten Q. Schneider, 2024. "A Robustness Test Protocol for Applied QCA: Theory and R Software Application," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 53(1), pages 57-88, February.
    4. Underdal, Arild, 1980. "Integrated marine policy : What? Why? How?," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 4(3), pages 159-169, July.
    5. Thomas Bolognesi & Florence Metz & Stéphane Nahrath, 2021. "Institutional complexity traps in policy integration processes: a long-term perspective on Swiss flood risk management," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 54(4), pages 911-941, December.
    6. Farkat Diógenes, Jamil Ramsi & Coelho Rodrigues, José & Farkat Diógenes, Maria Caroline & Claro, João, 2020. "Overcoming barriers to onshore wind farm implementation in Brazil," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    7. Ragin, Charles C., 2000. "Fuzzy-Set Social Science," University of Chicago Press Economics Books, University of Chicago Press, edition 1, number 9780226702773, October.
    8. Mahoney, James & Goertz, Gary, 2006. "A Tale of Two Cultures: Contrasting Quantitative and Qualitative Research," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14(3), pages 227-249, July.
    9. David Levi-Faur, 2004. "Comparative Research Designs in the Study of Regulation: How to Increase the Number of Cases without Compromising the Strengths of Case-Oriented Analysis," Chapters, in: Jacint Jordana & David Levi-Faur (ed.), The Politics of Regulation, chapter 8, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    10. Díaz, Paula & Adler, Carolina & Patt, Anthony, 2017. "Do stakeholders’ perspectives on renewable energy infrastructure pose a risk to energy policy implementation? A case of a hydropower plant in Switzerland," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 21-28.
    11. Daniel H. Cole & Peter Z. Grossman, 2002. "The Meaning of Property Rights: Law versus Economics?," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 78(3), pages 317-330.
    12. Μichalena, Evanthie & Hills, Jeremy M., 2012. "Renewable energy issues and implementation of European energy policy: The missing generation?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 201-216.
    13. Martin, Nigel & Rice, John, 2015. "Improving Australia's renewable energy project policy and planning: A multiple stakeholder analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 128-141.
    14. R. H. Coase, 2013. "The Problem of Social Cost," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 56(4), pages 837-877.
    15. Gerber, Jean-David & Knoepfel, Peter & Nahrath, Stéphane & Varone, Frédéric, 2009. "Institutional Resource Regimes: Towards sustainability through the combination of property-rights theory and policy analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(3), pages 798-809, January.
    16. Lena Kitzing & Morten Kofoed Jensen & Thomas Telsnig & Eric Lantz, 2020. "Multifaceted drivers for onshore wind energy repowering and their implications for energy transition," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 5(12), pages 1012-1021, December.
    17. Eva Thomann & Martino Maggetti, 2020. "Designing Research With Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA): Approaches, Challenges, and Tools," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 49(2), pages 356-386, May.
    18. Philipp Trein & Manuel Fischer & Martino Maggetti & Francesco Sarti, 2023. "Empirical research on policy integration: a review and new directions," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 56(1), pages 29-48, March.
    19. Bolognesi, Thomas & Nahrath, Stephane, 2020. "Environmental Governance Dynamics: Some Micro Foundations of Macro Failures," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    20. Martinez, Nain & Komendantova, Nadejda, 2020. "The effectiveness of the social impact assessment (SIA) in energy transition management: Stakeholders' insights from renewable energy projects in Mexico," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    21. Frédéric Varone & Stéphane Nahrath & David Aubin & Jean-David Gerber, 2013. "Functional regulatory spaces," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 46(4), pages 311-333, December.
    22. repec:ucp:bkecon:9780226702766 is not listed on IDEAS
    23. Larsen, Sanne Vammen & Hansen, Anne Merrild & Nielsen, Helle Nedergaard, 2018. "The role of EIA and weak assessments of social impacts in conflicts over implementation of renewable energy policies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 43-53.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. María José Dorado-Rubín & María José Guerrero-Mayo & Clemente Jesús Navarro-Yáñez, 2025. "Policy integration in urban policies as multi-level policy mixes," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 58(1), pages 45-67, March.
    2. Philipp Trein & Manuel Fischer & Martino Maggetti & Francesco Sarti, 2023. "Empirical research on policy integration: a review and new directions," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 56(1), pages 29-48, March.
    3. Thomas Bolognesi & Florence Metz & Stéphane Nahrath, 2021. "Institutional complexity traps in policy integration processes: a long-term perspective on Swiss flood risk management," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 54(4), pages 911-941, December.
    4. Bolognesi, Thomas & Pflieger, Géraldine, 2024. "Do you perceive interdependencies among human activities related to water? Drivers and effects on preferences for participation and regulation," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    5. Sébastien Lambelet, 2023. "Unintended policy integration through entrepreneurship at the implementation stage," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 56(1), pages 161-189, March.
    6. Guillermo M. Cejudo & Philipp Trein, 2023. "Policy integration as a political process," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 56(1), pages 3-8, March.
    7. Guillermo M. Cejudo & Philipp Trein, 2023. "Pathways to policy integration: a subsystem approach," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 56(1), pages 9-27, March.
    8. Ueli Reber & Manuel Fischer & Karin Ingold & Felix Kienast & Anna M. Hersperger & Rolf Grütter & Robin Benz, 2022. "Integrating biodiversity: a longitudinal and cross-sectoral analysis of Swiss politics," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 55(2), pages 311-335, June.
    9. Gustav Lidén, 2013. "What about theory? The consequences on a widened perspective of social theory," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 213-225, January.
    10. Di Paola, Nadia & Chari, Simos & Iannacci, Federico & Kraus, Sascha, 2025. "Configurational theory in business and management research: Status quo and guidelines for the application of qualitative comparative analysis (QCA)," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    11. Robbert Biesbroek & Jeroen J. L. Candel, 2020. "Mechanisms for policy (dis)integration: explaining food policy and climate change adaptation policy in the Netherlands," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 53(1), pages 61-84, March.
    12. Jean-David Gerber, St phane Nahrath, 2013. "Beitrag zur Entwicklung eines Ressourcenansatzes der Nachhaltigkeit," Diskussionsschriften credresearchpaper03, Universitaet Bern, Departement Volkswirtschaft - CRED.
    13. Martina Eckardt & Wolfgang Kerber, 2024. "Property rights theory, bundles of rights on IoT data, and the EU Data Act," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 57(1), pages 113-143, April.
    14. Dionysis Skarmeas & Constantinos N. Leonidou & Charalampos Saridakis & Giuseppe Musarra, 2020. "Pathways to Civic Engagement with Big Social Issues: An Integrated Approach," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 164(2), pages 261-285, June.
    15. Evangelia Krassadaki & Constantin Zopounidis & Christos Lemonakis, 2022. "Α fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis Approach for the evaluation of corporate viability," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 3549-3570, September.
    16. Bhalla, Sophie & Garrick, Dustin & McDermott, Constance L., 2025. "Trust, hope, and collective action in fragile political settings: A qualitative comparative analysis of water user groups in Tunisia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    17. Zhou, Tianxiao & Hu, Yuyao & Shan, Liping & Xiong, Changsheng, 2025. "What factors contribute to self-organized collective action for old village reconstruction? A qualitative comparative analysis of 36 villages in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    18. Barbara Vis, 2012. "The Comparative Advantages of fsQCA and Regression Analysis for Moderately Large-N Analyses," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 41(1), pages 168-198, February.
    19. Tran, Phuong Nguyen Thu & Gorton, Matthew & Lemke, Fred, 2021. "When supplier development initiatives fail: Identifying the causes of opportunism and unexpected outcomes," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 277-289.
    20. A. Nicita & M. Rizzolli & H. Smith, 2012. "Exploring Coase’s world: an introduction," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 59(2), pages 111-120, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:240:y:2026:i:c:s092180092500326x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ecolecon .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.