IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecolec/v240y2026ics0921800925002952.html

The effectiveness of unilateral fishing ban in contested waters: Evidence from the South China Sea

Author

Listed:
  • Quan, Yifei

Abstract

This study examines the effectiveness of China's unilateral fishing moratorium in the South China Sea, where unresolved sovereign rights disputes complicate policy enforcement and compliance. Using high-resolution vessel tracking data and causal inference techniques, I identify both intended and unintended impacts of this policy. The findings indicate that while domestic fishing effort within closed areas declines by 84% during the moratorium, regulated vessels' strategic reallocation of fishing activity before and after the ban, along with increased foreign fishing activity during the ban, offsets 60% of the intended conservation gain. Moreover, I find that policy effectiveness fluctuates with external political conditions, as higher compliance coincides with stricter law enforcement and heightened territorial disputes. These findings highlight the challenges of implementing sustainable fisheries management in the absence of clearly defined property rights.

Suggested Citation

  • Quan, Yifei, 2026. "The effectiveness of unilateral fishing ban in contested waters: Evidence from the South China Sea," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:240:y:2026:i:c:s0921800925002952
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108812
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800925002952
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108812?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rick D. Stuart-Smith & Amanda E. Bates & Jonathan S. Lefcheck & J. Emmett Duffy & Susan C. Baker & Russell J. Thomson & Jemina F. Stuart-Smith & Nicole A. Hill & Stuart J. Kininmonth & Laura Airoldi &, 2013. "Integrating abundance and functional traits reveals new global hotspots of fish diversity," Nature, Nature, vol. 501(7468), pages 539-542, September.
    2. Alan I. Barreca & Melanie Guldi & Jason M. Lindo & Glen R. Waddell, 2011. "Saving Babies? Revisiting the effect of very low birth weight classification," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 126(4), pages 2117-2123.
    3. Lawrence H. Goulder, 2013. "Markets for Pollution Allowances: What Are the (New) Lessons?," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 27(1), pages 87-102, Winter.
    4. Boersma, P. Dee & Parrish, Julia K., 1999. "Limiting abuse: marine protected areas, a limited solution," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 287-304, November.
    5. Sebastian Calonico & Matias D Cattaneo & Max H Farrell, 2020. "Optimal bandwidth choice for robust bias-corrected inference in regression discontinuity designs," The Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 23(2), pages 192-210.
    6. Shen, Gongming & Heino, Mikko, 2014. "An overview of marine fisheries management in China," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 265-272.
    7. Cornes,Richard & Sandler,Todd, 1996. "The Theory of Externalities, Public Goods, and Club Goods," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521477185, Enero-Abr.
    8. Grant R. McDermott & Kyle C. Meng & Gavin G. McDonald & Christopher J. Costello, 2019. "The blue paradox: Preemptive overfishing in marine reserves," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 116(12), pages 5319-5325, March.
    9. McWhinnie, Stephanie F., 2009. "The tragedy of the commons in international fisheries: An empirical examination," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 57(3), pages 321-333, May.
    10. Cullis-Suzuki, Sarika & Pauly, Daniel, 2010. "Failing the high seas: A global evaluation of regional fisheries management organizations," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 1036-1042, September.
    11. Julie M. Reimer & Rodolphe Devillers & Joachim Claudet, 2021. "Benefits and gaps in area-based management tools for the ocean Sustainable Development Goal," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 4(4), pages 349-357, April.
    12. Pécastaing, Nicolas & Salavarriga, Juan, 2022. "The potential impact of fishing in peruvian marine protected areas (MPAs) on artisanal fishery poverty during El Niño events," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    13. Gabriel Englander, 2019. "Property rights and the protection of global marine resources," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 2(10), pages 981-987, October.
    14. del Pilar Moreno-Sánchez, Rocío & Maldonado, Jorge Higinio, 2010. "Evaluating the role of co-management in improving governance of marine protected areas: An experimental approach in the Colombian Caribbean," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(12), pages 2557-2567, October.
    15. Corrêa, Maria Angélica de Almeida & Kahn, James R. & Freitas, Carlos Edwar de Carvalho, 2014. "Perverse incentives in fishery management: The case of the defeso in the Brazilian Amazon," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 186-194.
    16. Smith, Vernon L, 1969. "On Models of Commercial Fishing," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 77(2), pages 181-198, March/Apr.
    17. Faasen, Helena & Watts, Scotney, 2007. "Local community reaction to the `no-take' policy on fishing in the Tsitsikamma National Park, South Africa," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(1), pages 36-46, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Selles Jules & Bonhommeau Sylvain & Guillotreau Patrice & Vallée Thomas, 2020. "Can the Threat of Economic Sanctions Ensure the Sustainability of International Fisheries? An Experiment of a Dynamic Non-cooperative CPR Game with Uncertain Tipping Point," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 76(1), pages 153-176, May.
    2. Gary D. Libecap, 2013. "Addressing Global Environmental Externalities: Transaction Costs Considerations," NBER Working Papers 19501, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Gary D. Libecap, 2014. "Addressing Global Environmental Externalities: Transaction Costs Considerations," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 52(2), pages 424-479, June.
    4. Crow White & Christopher Costello, 2014. "Close the High Seas to Fishing?," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(3), pages 1-5, March.
    5. Mauricio Villamizar‐Villegas & Freddy A. Pinzon‐Puerto & Maria Alejandra Ruiz‐Sanchez, 2022. "A comprehensive history of regression discontinuity designs: An empirical survey of the last 60 years," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(4), pages 1130-1178, September.
    6. Ferro, Simone & Serra, Chiara, 2025. "Triage at shift changes and distortions in the perception and treatment of emergency patients," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    7. repec:ags:aaea22:335483 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Clarke, Damian & Bustos, Nicolás Lillo & Schythe, Kathya Tapia, 2022. "Estimating Inter-Generational Returns to Medical Care: New Evidence from At-Risk Newborns," IZA Discussion Papers 15593, IZA Network @ LISER.
    9. Frederik Noack & Ashley Larsen & Johannes Kamp & Christian Levers, 2022. "A bird's eye view of farm size and biodiversity: The ecological legacy of the iron curtain," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 104(4), pages 1460-1484, August.
    10. Eric Brunner & Shaun Dougherty & Stephen Ross, 2019. "The Effects of Career and Technical Education: Evidence from the Connecticut Technical High School System," Working Papers 2019-047, Human Capital and Economic Opportunity Working Group.
    11. Dongkyu Park & Nori Tarui, 2024. "The Effect of Diesel Vehicle Regulation on Air Quality in Seoul: Evidence from Seoul’s Low Emission Zone," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-20, November.
    12. Renato Rosa & João Vaz & Rui Mota & Alexandra Silva, 2018. "Preference for Landings’ Smoothing and Risk of Collapse in Optimal Fishery Policies: The Ibero-Atlantic Sardine Fishery," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 71(4), pages 875-895, December.
    13. Johan Eyckmans & Michael Finus, 2006. "New roads to international environmental agreements: the case of global warming," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 7(4), pages 391-414, March.
    14. Homonoff, Tatiana & Spreen, Thomas Luke & St. Clair, Travis, 2020. "Balance sheet insolvency and contribution revenue in public charities," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    15. Andrew B. Whitford & Derrick Anderson, 2021. "Governance landscapes for emerging technologies: The case of cryptocurrencies," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(4), pages 1053-1070, October.
    16. Luis R. Martinez & Jonas Jessen & Guo Xu, 2023. "A Glimpse of Freedom: Allied Occupation and Political Resistance in East Germany," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 15(1), pages 68-106, January.
    17. Acocella Nicola & Di Bartolomeo Giovanni, 2013. "Population location, commuting and local public goods: A political economy approach," wp.comunite 0105, Department of Communication, University of Teramo.
    18. Shamsuddin, Mrittika & Acosta, Pablo A. & Schwengber, Rovane Battaglin & Fix, Jedediah & Pirani, Nikolas, 2022. "The Labor Market Impacts of Venezuelan Refugees and Migrants in Brazil," IZA Discussion Papers 15384, IZA Network @ LISER.
    19. Rahul Singh & Moses Stewart, 2025. "Placebo Discontinuity Design," Papers 2507.12693, arXiv.org.
    20. Cornes Richard & Sandler Todd, 2000. "Pareto-Improving Redistribution and Pure Public Goods," German Economic Review, De Gruyter, vol. 1(2), pages 169-186, May.
    21. David Kelsey & Frank Milne, 2006. "Externalities, monopoly and the objective function of the firm," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 29(3), pages 565-589, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:240:y:2026:i:c:s0921800925002952. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ecolecon .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.