IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecolec/v240y2026ics0921800925002952.html

The effectiveness of unilateral fishing ban in contested waters: Evidence from the South China Sea

Author

Listed:
  • Quan, Yifei

Abstract

This study examines the effectiveness of China's unilateral fishing moratorium in the South China Sea, where unresolved sovereign rights disputes complicate policy enforcement and compliance. Using high-resolution vessel tracking data and causal inference techniques, I identify both intended and unintended impacts of this policy. The findings indicate that while domestic fishing effort within closed areas declines by 84% during the moratorium, regulated vessels' strategic reallocation of fishing activity before and after the ban, along with increased foreign fishing activity during the ban, offsets 60% of the intended conservation gain. Moreover, I find that policy effectiveness fluctuates with external political conditions, as higher compliance coincides with stricter law enforcement and heightened territorial disputes. These findings highlight the challenges of implementing sustainable fisheries management in the absence of clearly defined property rights.

Suggested Citation

  • Quan, Yifei, 2026. "The effectiveness of unilateral fishing ban in contested waters: Evidence from the South China Sea," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:240:y:2026:i:c:s0921800925002952
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108812
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800925002952
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108812?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:240:y:2026:i:c:s0921800925002952. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ecolecon .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.