IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecofin/v80y2025ics1062940825001263.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Portfolio diversification amid economic uncertainty in Pakistan: empirical evidence from the quantile-on-quantile approach

Author

Listed:
  • Zada, Hassan
  • Khan, Naveed
  • Rehman, Mobeen Ur
  • Vo, Xuan Vinh
  • Ghardallou, Wafa

Abstract

Over the past few decades, Economic Policy Uncertainty (EPU) has become a key driver of financial market dynamics, which influences investment decisions, risk perceptions, and overall economic stability. Therefore, our objective is to examine the impact of EPU on sectoral stocks in Pakistan. For the empirical analysis, we take monthly data from August 2010 to December 2023, and employ quantile-on-quantile regression approach (QQR) for the empirical analysis. This approach captures nonlinear and asymmetric relationships across different market conditions, thus making it ideal to analyze sectoral heterogeneity in response to changes in EPU. Our results highlight the negative effect of EPU on the returns in the Automobile & Assembler, Oil and Gas, and Refinery sectors at higher quantiles, whereas Banking and Power & Distribution sectors across all quantiles. However, in the Cement, Insurance, and Technology & Communication sectors, EPU positively affects returns at lower quantiles, whereas it negatively affects returns across higher quantiles. Policymakers should prioritize enhancing transparency and maintaining consistency in economic policies to minimize market disruptions caused by uncertainty. For portfolio managers, understanding the asymmetric impact of EPU can facilitate more effective risk management and asset allocation strategies, thus providing better diversification and hedging opportunities against uncertainty.

Suggested Citation

  • Zada, Hassan & Khan, Naveed & Rehman, Mobeen Ur & Vo, Xuan Vinh & Ghardallou, Wafa, 2025. "Portfolio diversification amid economic uncertainty in Pakistan: empirical evidence from the quantile-on-quantile approach," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecofin:v:80:y:2025:i:c:s1062940825001263
    DOI: 10.1016/j.najef.2025.102486
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1062940825001263
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.najef.2025.102486?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • B26 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought since 1925 - - - Financial Economics
    • C58 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Financial Econometrics
    • D53 - Microeconomics - - General Equilibrium and Disequilibrium - - - Financial Markets

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecofin:v:80:y:2025:i:c:s1062940825001263. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620163 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.