IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecoedu/v112y2026ics0272775726000348.html

Inequality and within-school student-teacher assignment patterns

Author

Listed:
  • Avery, Christopher
  • Bacher-Hicks, Andrew

Abstract

A major goal of U.S. education policy over the past half century has been to promote more equitable access to high-quality teachers. While most of the research and policy on this topic focuses on between-school differences in access to high-quality teachers, the teacher value-added literature shows that nearly all of the variation in teacher quality is within schools. In this paper, we focus on within-school patterns of student-teacher matching using administrative records from a state in the southeastern United States. We develop a measure of within-school matching based on student achievement and teacher value-added. On average, schools systematically match students to teachers in ways that expand achievement gaps, and within-school matching accounts for more than one-third of overall system-level matching. Using a series of fixed effects regressions, we show that within-school matching increases achievement gaps. These results suggest that improving the equity of within-school student-teacher assignments is a promising and low-cost strategy to improve educational opportunity for low achieving students and reduce achievement gaps.

Suggested Citation

  • Avery, Christopher & Bacher-Hicks, Andrew, 2026. "Inequality and within-school student-teacher assignment patterns," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecoedu:v:112:y:2026:i:c:s0272775726000348
    DOI: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2026.102792
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272775726000348
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.econedurev.2026.102792?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecoedu:v:112:y:2026:i:c:s0272775726000348. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/econedurev .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.