IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecoedu/v107y2025ics0272775725000573.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How cost framing affects college applications: evidence from a targeted information intervention

Author

Listed:
  • Price, Joshua A.

Abstract

This study evaluates an experiment conducted at a regional public university aimed at increasing college applications by reframing how tuition costs were presented to prospective students. High school seniors with a GPA of 3.0 or higher received letters outlining the application process and financial aid eligibility. A randomized subset received an enhanced version of the letter that emphasized the net cost of attending college—highlighting how the Pell Grant could significantly reduce tuition—rather than focusing on the full, list price. Results show that letters highlighting net costs increased application rates by 2.03 percentage points overall, with students most likely to qualify for the Pell Grant 4.08 percentage points more likely to apply. However, the intervention did not significantly influence enrollment decisions or FAFSA completion rates. These findings underscore both the promise and limitations of low-cost, information-based outreach efforts. While salient cost framing can shift application behavior, additional support may be needed to convert interest into enrollment—particularly at broad-access institutions serving economically diverse populations.

Suggested Citation

  • Price, Joshua A., 2025. "How cost framing affects college applications: evidence from a targeted information intervention," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecoedu:v:107:y:2025:i:c:s0272775725000573
    DOI: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2025.102677
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272775725000573
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.econedurev.2025.102677?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecoedu:v:107:y:2025:i:c:s0272775725000573. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/econedurev .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.