IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecmode/v156y2026ics0264999326000179.html

IPR protection and markup in China: Balancing innovation incentives and markup distortions

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Lihao
  • Chai, Jiwen
  • Nie, Song
  • Han, Shangrong

Abstract

In the context of rising markups worldwide, this study examines the role of intellectual property rights (IPR) protection in influencing firm-level markups and the mechanisms underlying this effect. Theoretically, we show that stronger IPR protection enhances firms’ innovation incentives, thereby increasing their pricing power. Empirically, using a quasinatural experiment and firm-level data from Chinese A-share-listed companies (2001–2020), we find that more robust IPR policies significantly increase patenting, citations and intangible assets—evidence of enhanced innovation. These policies also lead to higher markups, indicating increased market power. The effects are greater among high-tech and large firms. Results remain robust to a range of sensitivity checks and endogeneity concerns. Our findings reveal a key trade-off: while IPR reforms promote innovation, they may also distort competition through markup inflation. Therefore, policymakers should balance innovation incentives with measures to preserve market contestability, particularly in the increasingly intangible economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Lihao & Chai, Jiwen & Nie, Song & Han, Shangrong, 2026. "IPR protection and markup in China: Balancing innovation incentives and markup distortions," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecmode:v:156:y:2026:i:c:s0264999326000179
    DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2026.107488
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264999326000179
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.econmod.2026.107488?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecmode:v:156:y:2026:i:c:s0264999326000179. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/30411 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.