IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecmode/v155y2026ics0264999325003657.html

Disciplining the factor zoo: Identifying pricing factors in the Chinese stock market

Author

Listed:
  • Meng, Qingbin
  • Qi, Ji
  • Wang, Solomon
  • Zhao, Xuankai

Abstract

Despite a plethora of proposed market anomalies and risk factors, identifying truly impactful ones for China's stock market cross-sectional returns remains contentious. While existing literature focuses on mature markets, China as a major emerging market with distinct institutional features leaves factor validity unclear. Moving beyond merely finding anomalies, we employ double-selection LASSO under the framework of stochastic discount factor (SDF) to identify factors that carry independent and incremental information. Our findings show that most tested factors significantly explain cross-sectional returns, with corporate financials and market friction factors emerging as key sources of risk premia. Volatility-related factors demonstrate consistent explanatory power over time, and risk anomalies in the Chinese stock market do not disappear as in the U.S. market due to various barriers to arbitrage trading. These results highlight the limitations of parsimonious linear factor models and call for robust asset pricing frameworks and China-specific investment strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Meng, Qingbin & Qi, Ji & Wang, Solomon & Zhao, Xuankai, 2026. "Disciplining the factor zoo: Identifying pricing factors in the Chinese stock market," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecmode:v:155:y:2026:i:c:s0264999325003657
    DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2025.107370
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264999325003657
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.econmod.2025.107370?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecmode:v:155:y:2026:i:c:s0264999325003657. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/30411 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.