IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecmode/v151y2025ics0264999325002196.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Should economic theories guide the machine learning model in forecasting exchange rate?

Author

Listed:
  • Lin, Chien-Hsiu
  • Liu, Tao
  • Vincent, Kendro

Abstract

This study investigates whether integrating economic theory into the machine learning model by imposing monotonic constraints can improve the predictability of exchange rates. The black-box machine learning models have been praised for their predictive power in the empirical literature, leaving the question of the usefulness of economic theory unanswered. Using the tree-based model, we can impose the monotonic constraints implied by the economic theories on the possibly nonlinear relationship between the exchange rates and predictors. The empirical analyses suggest that the constrained models (with theory) often outperform those without constraints (without theory) in terms of statistical accuracy. In an experiment to examine the economic value, the currency portfolios based on these model predictions also deliver better risk-adjusted returns than the commonly used strategies, such as carry trade and momentum. The findings suggest that economic theories should be combined into the tree-based machine learning model for more accurate exchange rate forecasts.

Suggested Citation

  • Lin, Chien-Hsiu & Liu, Tao & Vincent, Kendro, 2025. "Should economic theories guide the machine learning model in forecasting exchange rate?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecmode:v:151:y:2025:i:c:s0264999325002196
    DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2025.107224
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264999325002196
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.econmod.2025.107224?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecmode:v:151:y:2025:i:c:s0264999325002196. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/30411 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.