IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecmode/v151y2025ics0264999325002147.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Policy uncertainty and cost stickiness: Evidence from IPO suspensions in China

Author

Listed:
  • Xia, Yanchun
  • Dong, Junqi
  • Guo, Shijun

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of policy uncertainty stemming from initial public offering (IPO) suspensions on the asymmetric behavior of selling, general, and administrative (SG&A) expenses. By analyzing the three latest IPO suspensions in China, we find that IPO suspensions increase the stickiness of SG&A expenses. Furthermore, the amplification of SG&A expense asymmetry due to IPO suspensions is more prominent in companies with higher labor intensity, asset intensity, and sales volatility, and among non-state-owned enterprises. Additional analyses reveal that the correlation between policy uncertainty and cost stickiness diminishes once affected companies complete their IPOs and that IPO suspensions result in poorer post-IPO accounting and stock performance. Finally, we find that different IPO pricing regimes do not affect our baseline findings. Collectively, our results suggest that managers retain slack resources during periods of heightened policy uncertainty in the context of IPO suspensions.

Suggested Citation

  • Xia, Yanchun & Dong, Junqi & Guo, Shijun, 2025. "Policy uncertainty and cost stickiness: Evidence from IPO suspensions in China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecmode:v:151:y:2025:i:c:s0264999325002147
    DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2025.107219
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264999325002147
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.econmod.2025.107219?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • G38 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • G32 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill
    • G34 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Mergers; Acquisitions; Restructuring; Corporate Governance

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecmode:v:151:y:2025:i:c:s0264999325002147. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/30411 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.