Author
Abstract
Accelerating the enhancement of regional economic resilience serves as a crucial pathway for China's economy to withstand external risks and achieve stable, high-quality development. Drawing on panel data from China's 31 provinces spanning 2015–2024, this study leverages the quasi-natural experiment created by the gradient implementation of energy transition policies. A multi-period difference-in-differences model is constructed to empirically examine the impact mechanism of energy transition policies on regional economic resilience. Findings reveal that stronger implementation of energy transition policies significantly enhances regional economies' resilience to external shocks and their capacity for recovery and growth. This effect operates through promoting industrial structure optimization and upgrading, stimulating technological innovation, improving green infrastructure, and cultivating new growth drivers. Heterogeneity analysis reveals that the promotional effect of energy transition policies is more pronounced in regions with advanced industrial structures and mature digital economies. It also strengthens economic resilience in areas with higher human capital levels, while its impact is significantly weakened in regions heavily reliant on energy endowments. From a macro-spatial perspective, the spillover effects exhibit a distinct geographic gradient, with the strongest effects in the east, followed by the central region, and the weakest in the west. The findings enrich empirical evidence on the economic impacts of energy transition policies and offer valuable insights for refining supporting policies, strengthening regional economic resilience, and advancing high-quality economic development.
Suggested Citation
Yan, Fangfang, 2026.
"The impact of energy transition policies on regional economic resilience,"
Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 935-951.
Handle:
RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:92:y:2026:i:c:p:935-951
DOI: 10.1016/j.eap.2026.06.045
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:92:y:2026:i:c:p:935-951. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/economic-analysis-and-policy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.