IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecanpo/v92y2026icp177-191.html

Bankruptcy trial reform and corporate labour employment

Author

Listed:
  • Yang, Xingquan
  • Wang, Lingli

Abstract

In recent years, the government of China is pursuing bankruptcy trial reform (BTR) to strengthen the enforcement of its bankruptcy laws. While prior literature has emphasized the role of BTR in creditor protection and corporate investment efficiency, its implications for labour market dynamics remain underexplored. Based on a quasi-natural experiment of staggered establishment of liquidation and bankruptcy trial tribunals in different regions, this study examines the impact of BTR on corporate employment levels. Using a sample of Chinese A-share listed firms from 2012 to 2022 and a multi-period difference-in-differences model, this study found that BTR can significantly expand the scale of labour employment in enterprises in pilot cities. Mechanism analysis shows that BTR expands the scale of bank credit to alleviate the financing constraints of enterprises. It also reduces tax burdens and transaction costs to promote the governance of zombie enterprises, thus expanding the scale of enterprise labour employment. Heterogeneity analysis indicates that institutional reform effects are stronger in state-owned enterprises, labour-intensive firms, regions with lower judicial quality, and areas with higher labour supply. Extended analysis finds that BTR also helps enterprises improve their human capital structure and labour income share.

Suggested Citation

  • Yang, Xingquan & Wang, Lingli, 2026. "Bankruptcy trial reform and corporate labour employment," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 177-191.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:92:y:2026:i:c:p:177-191
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eap.2026.06.013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0313592626001980
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eap.2026.06.013?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:92:y:2026:i:c:p:177-191. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/economic-analysis-and-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.