Author
Listed:
- Chen, Lei
- He, Fang
- He, Yongxue
- Wang, Ruitian
- Zhang, Qionxin
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI), a general-purpose technology with the characteristics of a new type of infrastructure, can augment both capital and labor. Its impact on the labor income share (LIS) remains debated. From the perspective of biased technological progress, this paper investigates how AI affects the LIS through both theoretical and empirical analyses. First, using a factor-augmenting CES production function, we incorporate AI and biased technological progress into a unified framework for the determination of the LIS and clarify the sources of variation in labor’s share. Second, we use machine learning to build an AI dictionary, perform patent text analysis, and construct a city-level AI index. Based on panel data on 287 Chinese cities from 2008 to 2022, we then examine the effects of AI and biased technological progress on the LIS. The results show that AI development significantly reduces the LIS. The finding remains robust to alternative measures, different sample windows, alternative estimators, and IV (2SLS) strategies that address endogeneity. Mechanism and channel analyses suggest that AI promotes capital-biased technological change, thereby turn depresses the LIS. Industrial upgrading and ownership structure significantly raise the LIS and mitigate AI’s adverse impact. Heterogeneity analysis shows that the negative effect of AI on the LIS is more pronounced in labor-intensive, inland, small and medium-sized, and central and western cities. This study provides policy insights for developing economies such as China in mitigating the labor-market consequences of AI, narrowing income gaps, and advancing common prosperity.
Suggested Citation
Chen, Lei & He, Fang & He, Yongxue & Wang, Ruitian & Zhang, Qionxin, 2026.
"The impact of artificial intelligence on labor income share: From the perspective of technological progress bias,"
Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 16-33.
Handle:
RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:92:y:2026:i:c:p:16-33
DOI: 10.1016/j.eap.2026.05.011
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:92:y:2026:i:c:p:16-33. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/economic-analysis-and-policy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.