IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecanpo/v91y2026icp857-874.html

Comparing the multi-objective effects of quantitative and price-based monetary policy tools: dual evidence from same- and mixed-frequency models

Author

Listed:
  • Gao, Henan
  • Wong, Shu

Abstract

This study investigates the dynamic regulatory effects of China’s quantitative and price-based monetary policy tools on the macroeconomy, private consumption, and financial markets by applying a factor-augmented vector autoregressive model with time-varying coefficients and stochastic volatitity (SV-TVP-FAVAR) to data from 1996:Q1 to 2025:Q2, and reanalyzing the results with mixed-frequency data. The findings show that: (1) expansionary quantitative monetary policy promotes economic growth, inflation, and asset price, but initially boosts private consumption before exerting a suppressive influence; (2) contractionary price-based monetary policy helps prevent economic overheating, suppressing output and inflation, initially suppressing private consumption and fianncial market before promoting them; (3) under mixed-frequency data, there are significant differences in the lag effects and response magnitudes of monetary policy shocks, providing insights into short-term policy behaviors and supporting timely policy adjustments. Therefore, monetary authorities should select policy tools based on the economic environment to achieve regulatory objectives and maintain stable economic growth.

Suggested Citation

  • Gao, Henan & Wong, Shu, 2026. "Comparing the multi-objective effects of quantitative and price-based monetary policy tools: dual evidence from same- and mixed-frequency models," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 857-874.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:91:y:2026:i:c:p:857-874
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eap.2026.03.041
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0313592626001359
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eap.2026.03.041?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:91:y:2026:i:c:p:857-874. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/economic-analysis-and-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.