IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecanpo/v91y2026icp730-758.html

The “carbon unlocking” effect of energy marketization reform: A tri-dimensional perspective of allocation, structure, and efficiency

Author

Listed:
  • Hu, Zheng
  • Xu, Yingzhi
  • Li, Yue

Abstract

The carbon lock-in (CLI) dilemma, driven by excessive and inefficient energy use, poses a critical barrier to urban green transitions. Energy marketization reform, as the core measure for optimizing the energy system, provides a practical and feasible route for cities to advance carbon unlocking. Centering on the energy-consuming right trading policy (ECRTP), a key practice in China’s energy marketization reform, this study applies a double machine learning model to examine its impact on CLI, and analyze its mediating, moderating, and synergistic effects. The results show that: (1) The ECRTP exerts a significant suppressive effect on urban CLI, and it holds steady under multiple robustness validations. (2) The ECRTP promotes urban carbon unlocking by curbing energy over-allocation, advancing dual energy-structure upgrading, and improving energy efficiency. However, the channels related to alleviating energy under-allocation and restraining total energy consumption have not yet taken effect. (3) Market integration, institutional green bias, and public behavior drive have significantly moderated the effect of ECRTP. (4) The ECRTP has significant regional synergy, policy synergy, and pollution-carbon reduction synergy effects. This research offers strong empirical support for promoting energy marketization reform, continuously facilitating urban carbon unlocking, and improving the global climate governance system.

Suggested Citation

  • Hu, Zheng & Xu, Yingzhi & Li, Yue, 2026. "The “carbon unlocking” effect of energy marketization reform: A tri-dimensional perspective of allocation, structure, and efficiency," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 730-758.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:91:y:2026:i:c:p:730-758
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eap.2026.03.048
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0313592626001475
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eap.2026.03.048?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:91:y:2026:i:c:p:730-758. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/economic-analysis-and-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.