IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecanpo/v91y2026icp1702-1722.html

Digitization and agricultural carbon mitigation in China: A perspective of marginal carbon abatement costs

Author

Listed:
  • Zhou, Zhibo
  • Liu, Min
  • Jiangfeng,

Abstract

If the carbon abatement cost is neglected, the sustainability of carbon mitigation will be threatened. Therefore, studying how to reduce the agricultural carbon abatement costs is a crucial issue. We employ Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) method to assess the agricultural marginal carbon abatement costs (AMCAC) of 30 provinces in China from 2011 to 2021, then investigate the impact of digitization (DIGI) on agricultural carbon emissions intensity (ACEI) and AMCAC. The results show that DIGI can significantly simultaneously decrease ACEI and AMCAC, but only in non-foodgrain main producing areas and Eastern region. Technology and leisure agriculture both contribute to reducing ACEI and AMCAC, but land scale will only significantly reduce AMCAC. The impact of DIGI on AMCAC exhibits a double threshold effect of ACEI, that is, DIGI will decrease AMCAC, only when ACEI is over a specific strength. The findings of this paper provide new pathways for safeguarding food security and achieving the “double-carbon” goals.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhou, Zhibo & Liu, Min & Jiangfeng,, 2026. "Digitization and agricultural carbon mitigation in China: A perspective of marginal carbon abatement costs," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 1702-1722.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:91:y:2026:i:c:p:1702-1722
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eap.2026.06.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0313592626001992
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eap.2026.06.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:91:y:2026:i:c:p:1702-1722. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/economic-analysis-and-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.