IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecanpo/v90y2026icp888-912.html

Bank discretionary provisioning and systemic risk under impairment accounting standard reforms

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Zhinan
  • Li, Siqi
  • Shen, Peilong

Abstract

To reduce the procyclicality of the incurred loss (IL) model revealed during the global financial crisis, the International Accounting Standards Board introduced the new impairment standard centered on expected loss (EL) model. This paper develops an economic model with an interbank market to assess how forward-looking provisioning under EL affects systemic risk relative to IL. Simulations show that for small shocks, EL reduces systemic risk when banks underestimate or correctly estimate losses, but can increase risk when losses are overestimated, due to excessive capital depletion. As shocks intensify, EL strengthens resilience by inducing banks to build larger capital buffers ahead of crises. Analytical findings further indicate that banks provision more aggressively under larger shocks or weaker capital positions. Overall, the risk-mitigating benefits of EL depend on both shock magnitude and banks’ discretionary bias, implying the need for stronger regulatory oversight alongside risk forecasting.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Zhinan & Li, Siqi & Shen, Peilong, 2026. "Bank discretionary provisioning and systemic risk under impairment accounting standard reforms," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 888-912.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:90:y:2026:i:c:p:888-912
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eap.2026.01.048
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0313592626000482
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eap.2026.01.048?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:90:y:2026:i:c:p:888-912. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/economic-analysis-and-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.