IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecanpo/v90y2026icp764-798.html

The freedom factor: Is economic freedom key to reducing internal conflict and state fragility? – An empirical study of 92 developing countries

Author

Listed:
  • Parsons, Brandon

Abstract

This study examines the effects of the Fraser Institute’s Economic Freedom of the World index on state fragility and internal conflict, including civil war/coups, terrorism, and civil disorder, in 92 developing countries from 1985 to 2020. The findings are robust across alternative controls, multiple econometric frameworks (e.g., ordinary least squares, fixed and random effects, generalized method of moments, feasible generalized least squares, and method of moments quantile regression), and different temporal specifications (annual versus multi-year intervals), strongly supporting capitalist peace theory by showing that economic freedom reduces internal conflict and state fragility. Yet, the study finds the effects of economic freedom can vary across conflict types. For civil war and coups, economic freedom’s moderating role is weaker and may be overshadowed by cultural, ideological, and power struggles. In the case of terrorism and political violence, economic freedom appears to increase terrorism and political violence in more peaceful settings, is insignificant at moderate levels, but becomes a stabilizing force when terrorism and political violence is high. Notably, economic freedom consistently moderates civil disorder across most models, suggesting that expanded opportunities reduce incentives for protest, unlike democratic freedoms, which, by protecting rights such as assembly and free expression, may inadvertently enable more civil disorder. Among the five dimensions of economic freedom, legal system and property rights, sound money, and freedom to trade internationally have the strongest and most consistent conflict and fragility-reducing effects, particularly in severe conflict and fragility settings. By contrast, smaller government increase state fragility by weakening state capacity, and deregulation exacerbates state fragility by eroding protections and fueling grievances. Importantly, quantile analysis reveals that economic freedom has a greater conflict/fragility reducing effects in high-conflict/fragility environments, underscoring its critical role in promoting stability and economic development in vulnerable states.

Suggested Citation

  • Parsons, Brandon, 2026. "The freedom factor: Is economic freedom key to reducing internal conflict and state fragility? – An empirical study of 92 developing countries," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 764-798.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:90:y:2026:i:c:p:764-798
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eap.2026.01.062
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0313592626000627
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eap.2026.01.062?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D74 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Conflict; Conflict Resolution; Alliances; Revolutions
    • P16 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Capitalist Economies - - - Capitalist Institutions; Welfare State

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:90:y:2026:i:c:p:764-798. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/economic-analysis-and-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.