IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecanpo/v90y2026icp632-649.html

FinTech, bank proximity, and corporate innovation: Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Dong, Xiaolin
  • Zhu, Shengming
  • Qi, Hao

Abstract

This study investigates the evolving relevance of geographic banking advantages in corporate innovation and examines how financial technology (FinTech) disrupts traditional spatial dependencies in innovation financing. Using a panel of Chinese listed firms from 2011 to 2021, we find that bank proximity remains positively associated with innovation performance, yet the development of FinTech significantly weakens this relationship. This attenuation effect is more pronounced for underlying FinTech technologies and for proximity to small banks. The plausible mechanism is that FinTech mitigates financing constraints by reducing information asymmetries associated with lending distance, which in turn fosters innovation through increased investment in human capital, innovation-supporting infrastructure, and R&D expenditure. Heterogeneity tests further suggest that FinTech’s innovation-enhancing effect is stronger for small firms, startups, and firms in regions with underdeveloped transportation or rugged terrain. Our findings underscore the transformative potential of FinTech in overcoming geographic barriers and fostering a more efficient and inclusive allocation of innovation capital.

Suggested Citation

  • Dong, Xiaolin & Zhu, Shengming & Qi, Hao, 2026. "FinTech, bank proximity, and corporate innovation: Evidence from China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 632-649.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:90:y:2026:i:c:p:632-649
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eap.2026.01.053
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0313592626000536
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eap.2026.01.053?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:90:y:2026:i:c:p:632-649. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/economic-analysis-and-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.