IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecanpo/v90y2026icp378-404.html

Judicial independence and entrepreneurship: Evidence from China's judicial independence reform

Author

Listed:
  • Ding, Hai
  • Yu, Qiuzuo
  • Yuan, Zhengrong

Abstract

This study offers a causal evaluation of judicial independence reforms and their impact on entrepreneurship in an emerging transitional economy, exploiting China’s staggered judicial reform initiated in 2014. The reform fundamentally altered the governance of local courts by reallocating authority over judicial finances and personnel away from local governments, thereby limiting political interference in adjudication. We demonstrate that the reform significantly increased entrepreneurial activity, resulting in a 9.7% increase in new firm registrations in reform cities, with the effect remaining robust across alternative specifications. Mechanism analyses indicate that enhanced judicial independence constrains executive power, strengthens public trust, improves access to external finance, and promotes innovation. Moreover, the reform reshaped the composition of new entrants toward a more modern economy, with faster growth in private, contract-intensive, and high-tech firms. Overall, the findings highlight the role of judicial independence reforms and provide policy-relevant insights for developing countries seeking to strengthen legal institutions and support economic development.

Suggested Citation

  • Ding, Hai & Yu, Qiuzuo & Yuan, Zhengrong, 2026. "Judicial independence and entrepreneurship: Evidence from China's judicial independence reform," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 378-404.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:90:y:2026:i:c:p:378-404
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eap.2026.01.027
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0313592626000275
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eap.2026.01.027?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:90:y:2026:i:c:p:378-404. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/economic-analysis-and-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.