Author
Listed:
- Zareian Baghdad Abadi, Faezeh
- Liu, Weili
Abstract
Nowadays, the digital economy serves as a major driver of socio-economic development and a key accelerator of innovation, particularly within the Digital Silk Road (DSR) initiative. Accordingly, this study investigates how digital trade through the Digital Silk Road (DSR) affects innovation quantity and quality, and also examines how digital industrialization and digital inclusion moderate this relationship. Using data from 2010 to 2023, an integrated empirical framework combining propensity score matching with multi period difference-in-differences (PSM-DiD) approach is applied to DSR member countries and the host country, China. The current research declares the following findings. First, the digital trade in DSR countries increases the quantity of innovation (patent applications) while the quality of innovation (knowledge and technology outputs index) is economically and statistically larger in magnitude. Second, digital inclusion and digital industrialization are key positive moderators. Third, the heterogeneity analysis stated that the quality of innovation is more pronounced in the non-Asian regions, high-level economic development countries, or high-marketization-level countries. In China, innovation quantity (patent authorizations, trademark ownership) has risen sharply, while innovation quality shows mixed effects: digital trade via DSR boosts new product revenue but negligibly impacts high-tech exports. This study advances the literature by jointly evaluating both innovation quantity and quality, and providing a systematic comparison between DSR member countries and China. Based on the results obtained, related policy recommendations emphasize that strengthening digital economy through improved digital infrastructure, regulatory frameworks, and innovation supporting mechanisms with emphasis on prioritizing innovation quality. Additionally, fostering public–private collaboration is crucial for efficient resource allocation and sustainable innovation outcomes.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:90:y:2026:i:c:p:1582-1606. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/economic-analysis-and-policy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.