IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecanpo/v89y2026icp944-964.html

Can carbon commitments enhance the consistency of carbon disclosure and carbon performance? A natural experiment based on China's carbon neutrality commitment

Author

Listed:
  • Chen, Jianghe
  • Hu, Fengying

Abstract

Increasing the consistency between corporate carbon disclosures and carbon performance is essential for combating climate change. This study utilizes China’s 2020 carbon neutrality commitment as a natural experiment. Employing a difference-in-differences (DID) methodology, the research examines how carbon commitments influence the consistency of corporate carbon disclosure and carbon performance. The findings indicate that carbon commitments significantly enhance both carbon disclosure and carbon performance, while also fostering greater consistency between the two. Mechanism analysis suggests that carbon commitments mainly promote consistency by influencing corporate executives’ green perceptions and attracting heightened external green attention. Additional analysis reveals that these effects are more pronounced in regions with stronger external regulatory pressures and in firms with robust internal controls, higher-quality financial disclosures, and more advanced digital transformations. These insights offer a deeper understanding of the policy effects of carbon commitments and the factors that influence corporate carbon governance.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen, Jianghe & Hu, Fengying, 2026. "Can carbon commitments enhance the consistency of carbon disclosure and carbon performance? A natural experiment based on China's carbon neutrality commitment," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 944-964.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:89:y:2026:i:c:p:944-964
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eap.2025.12.014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0313592625004977
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eap.2025.12.014?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:89:y:2026:i:c:p:944-964. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/economic-analysis-and-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.