IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecanpo/v89y2026icp606-625.html

Does digital governance improve urban carbon balance? Evidence from China’s e-governance pilot

Author

Listed:
  • You, Jiansheng

Abstract

Governments worldwide are accelerating digital governance, yet its effects on urban carbon balance remain unclear. This paper argues that e-governance improves carbon balance by reducing information and enforcement frictions that would otherwise allow high-emission activities to persist. Results show that pilot cities experience significantly greater improvements in urban carbon balance than non-pilot cities, reflecting a more efficient allocation of regulatory resources rather than broad macroeconomic trends. The gains are more evident in cities with stronger internet infrastructure, more stable political incentives, and less resource-dependent economic structures. Moreover, in regions with stricter environmental enforcement, higher public environmental concern, and greater green innovation capacity, the effect is amplified, indicating that digital governance reinforces existing regulatory and societal pressures. Spatial spillover evidence further shows that the improvement extends beyond treated cities, fostering regional advancement. The study identifies an institutional channel through which information capacity shapes environmental performance, complementing existing literature that focuses mainly on technological or industrial drivers.

Suggested Citation

  • You, Jiansheng, 2026. "Does digital governance improve urban carbon balance? Evidence from China’s e-governance pilot," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 606-625.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:89:y:2026:i:c:p:606-625
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eap.2025.12.030
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0313592625005132
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eap.2025.12.030?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:89:y:2026:i:c:p:606-625. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/economic-analysis-and-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.