IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecanpo/v89y2026icp472-489.html

Mobility and monopsony power in labor market: Evidence from China's hukou reform

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Ningning
  • Shi, Hongqi
  • Wang, Yongjin
  • Zhang, Jie

Abstract

This paper investigates the impact of labor mobility on monopsony power exercised by micro-firms against workers. We estimate firm-specific wage markdown, departure of wage from marginal revenue product of labor (MRPL), from China’s disaggregate production dataset for the measurement of monopsony power. We employ a difference-in-difference estimation strategy to infer the causal relationship by using the non-uniform implementation of China’s hukou reform as an exogenous shock. The empirical results show that hukou system reform could widen wage markdowns, indicating the relaxation in internal migration restriction allow micro-firms to exert higher monopsony power. The positive impact of hukou reform on MRPL dominates the causality relationship. Our counterfactual experiment by eliminating the positive impact of hukou reform on monopsony power indicates the hukou reform accelerate the declining trend of China’s aggregate labor share.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Ningning & Shi, Hongqi & Wang, Yongjin & Zhang, Jie, 2026. "Mobility and monopsony power in labor market: Evidence from China's hukou reform," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 472-489.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:89:y:2026:i:c:p:472-489
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eap.2025.12.016
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0313592625004990
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eap.2025.12.016?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:89:y:2026:i:c:p:472-489. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/economic-analysis-and-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.