Author
Listed:
- Bai, Yun
- Zhang, Xin’ai
- Wang, Siyun
- Ma, Minghui
Abstract
The construction of a scientific and efficient ecological and environmental governance mechanism is a key pathway to achieving the coordinated unity of economic growth and sustainable development. Using the pollutant emission permit policy as a quasi-natural experiment, this study systematically evaluates the impact of market-based environmental regulation on pollutant emissions. The results show that market-based regulation significantly reduces pollutant emissions, reflecting an individual effect. At the same time, by raising environmental thresholds, it accelerates the exit of low-productivity firms and thereby compels firms to pursue green transformation, reflecting a market allocation effect. In addition, market-based regulation strengthens information disclosure, reduces adverse selection risks, and helps firms gain greater access to credit, while their competitiveness in non-green sectors remains unaffected. Further analysis indicates that market-based environmental regulation effectively promotes substantive green transformation, whereas government-led regulation tends to trigger greenwashing behaviors and encourages firms to relocate to regions with lower environmental costs. At the policy level, different types of regulation are complementary, with government-led measures delivering rapid results in situations of severe pollution, while market-based regulation fosters long-term, stable emission reductions and green transformation through incentives for green innovation and optimized capital allocation.
Suggested Citation
Bai, Yun & Zhang, Xin’ai & Wang, Siyun & Ma, Minghui, 2026.
"Actions according with words? Environmental regulation and pollutant emissions,"
Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 459-471.
Handle:
RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:89:y:2026:i:c:p:459-471
DOI: 10.1016/j.eap.2025.12.022
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:89:y:2026:i:c:p:459-471. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/economic-analysis-and-policy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.