IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecanpo/v89y2026icp384-401.html

Does urban renewal help reduce carbon emissions? Empirical evidence from Chinese cities

Author

Listed:
  • Shi, Chao
  • Xu, Ning
  • Niu, Zongling

Abstract

This study employs China's ongoing urban old residential community renovation pilot policy (UORCRPP) as a quasi-natural experiment. Based on panel data from 283 Chinese cities, we apply a difference-in-differences (DID) model to analyze the impact of urban renewal (UR) on urban carbon emissions (UCE) and its transmission mechanisms. The findings reveal that: (1) UR significantly reduces UCE. (2) UR reduces UCE through four transmission mechanisms: infrastructure construction, productive service industry development, resource factor allocation, and economic agglomeration. (3) UR demonstrates stronger carbon reduction effects in central and western cities, southern cities, small and medium-sized cities, non-resource-based cities, non-low-carbon pilot cities, non-new-type urbanization pilot cities, and non-innovation pilot cities. (4) UR generates significant negative spatial spillover effects on UCE in surrounding areas, with maximum negative spatial spillover occurring at a distance of 200 kilometers.

Suggested Citation

  • Shi, Chao & Xu, Ning & Niu, Zongling, 2026. "Does urban renewal help reduce carbon emissions? Empirical evidence from Chinese cities," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 384-401.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:89:y:2026:i:c:p:384-401
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eap.2025.12.017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0313592625005004
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eap.2025.12.017?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:89:y:2026:i:c:p:384-401. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/economic-analysis-and-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.