IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecanpo/v89y2026icp287-305.html

The impact of place-based policy on agricultural green total factor productivity: Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Wu, Di
  • Bao, Yuxiang
  • Wang, Huizong
  • Zhang, Fengbing

Abstract

China’s smallholder agriculture boosts output but has led to severe rural ecological degradation, constraining agricultural green total factor productivity (AGTFP). While place-based policies such as the National Modern Agricultural Demonstration Zones (NMADZs) have been introduced to address this challenge, their impact and underlying mechanisms on AGTFP remain insufficiently understood and lack rigorous causal evidence. Using a time-varying difference-in-differences (DID) model on prefecture-level panel data from 2006 to 2020, this study finds that the establishment of NMADZs significantly increased AGTFP by 7.1 %. This improvement is primarily driven by technological progress, large-scale operations, and industrial agglomeration in agriculture. The effects are more pronounced in less-developed and non-major grain-producing regions, highlighting the importance of tailored policy implementation. Moreover, synergistic investments in infrastructure and green finance further amplify the positive impacts of the policy. Overall, the findings underscore the effectiveness of place-based interventions in promoting a green and scale-oriented agricultural transition and emphasize the need for complementary supportive measures to maximize their benefits.

Suggested Citation

  • Wu, Di & Bao, Yuxiang & Wang, Huizong & Zhang, Fengbing, 2026. "The impact of place-based policy on agricultural green total factor productivity: Evidence from China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 287-305.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:89:y:2026:i:c:p:287-305
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eap.2025.12.007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0313592625004904
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eap.2025.12.007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:89:y:2026:i:c:p:287-305. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/economic-analysis-and-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.