IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecanpo/v89y2026icp178-195.html

Mandatory cleaner production audit and enterprise carbon emission intensity: An examination under whole-chain governance

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Bingbing
  • Zhang, Yewei
  • Cao, Lijuan
  • Sun, Chuanwang

Abstract

This study clarifies the theoretical mechanisms through which the Mandatory Cleaner Production Audit (MCPA) affects enterprises' carbon emission intensity. Then, it matches the list of key enterprises designated for MCPA in the five batches released by the State Environmental Protection Administration with the National Tax Survey Database from 2008 to 2016. By exploiting the introduction of MCPA as a quasi-natural experiment, this study applies a multi-period difference-in-differences (DID) model to identify the causal net effect of MCPA on enterprises' carbon emission intensity. The results indicate that MCPA significantly reduces carbon emission intensity. This finding remains robust across a series of tests, including parallel trend assessments and controls for other potential policy interferences. Heterogeneity analysis reveals that the effects vary significantly depending on many factors such as enterprise's financial constraints and the level of public environmental awareness in its region. Through a full-chain governance framework encompassing “source prevention - process control - end governance,” we further identify two underlying mechanisms: input substitution and innovation compensation effects. Additionally, extended analysis shows that the policy not only delivers substantial environmental benefits but also enhances an enterprise's output value and total factor productivity, demonstrating a synergistic achievement of both environmental protection and economic growth.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Bingbing & Zhang, Yewei & Cao, Lijuan & Sun, Chuanwang, 2026. "Mandatory cleaner production audit and enterprise carbon emission intensity: An examination under whole-chain governance," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 178-195.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:89:y:2026:i:c:p:178-195
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eap.2025.11.025
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0313592625004771
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eap.2025.11.025?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:89:y:2026:i:c:p:178-195. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/economic-analysis-and-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.