Author
Listed:
- Guan, Tong
- Zheng, Rui
- Chen, Aoyun
Abstract
Amid the rapid progression of artificial intelligence technology, the integration of intelligent applications into corporate production and operations is continuously transforming energy utilization methods, thereby profoundly affecting energy consumption efficiency and sustainable development. Consequently, this study employs panel data from China's A-share listed companies covering 2013 to 2023, treating the next-generation artificial intelligence innovation development pilot zone policy (the AIDPZ policy) as a quasi-natural experiment. Using a multi-period difference-in-differences methodology and combining theoretical with empirical approaches, it examines the impact and mechanistic pathways of these pilot zones on enterprise energy consumption. Results demonstrate that AIDPZ Policy implementation significantly reduces corporate energy consumption, a finding that persists after undergoing a series of robustness checks. Mechanism tests indicate that AIDPZ Policy drives energy consumption reduction by enhancing firms' artificial intelligence application capabilities, boosting green innovation, and improving resource allocation efficiency. Heterogeneity analysis reveals that AIDPZ Policy's inhibitory effect on energy consumption is more evident in non-heavy polluting enterprises, non-state-owned firms, and businesses in highly marketized regions. Further analysis finds AIDPZ Policy promotes high-quality enterprise development and synergizes with government environmental regulations and corporate executives' sustainability efforts to reduce energy consumption effects. This paper not only enriches theoretical studies on artificial intelligence policy impacts and corporate energy use, providing fresh analytical viewpoints for related fields, but also offers practical guidance for advancing corporate energy conservation, emission reduction, and green transition.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:89:y:2026:i:c:p:148-164. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/economic-analysis-and-policy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.