Author
Listed:
- Zhang, Zicheng
- Chen, Shi
- Huang, Yixiong
Abstract
Energy use rights and carbon emission rights trading pilot policies are market-based measures designed to address climate challenges by encouraging firms to improve energy efficiency and reduce carbon emissions. In China, certain regions have implemented both policies simultaneously, giving rise to a dual pilot framework. However, the effect of this coordinated policy arrangement on corporate low-carbon transition (CLT) remains insufficiently examined. This study leverages panel data from China’s A-share listed companies between 2011 and 2021. We construct an optimized-EBM model that incorporates undesirable outputs to measure CLT performance and employ a synthetic difference-in-differences (SDID) approach to evaluate how the dual pilot policy impacts CLT. The empirical results demonstrate that the dual pilot policy significantly promotes CLT, with robustness checks supporting this finding. Mechanism analysis reveals two core channels: endogenous drivers—including green innovation, resource allocation, and operational capability; and exogenous responses—such as carbon risk awareness and green strategic orientation. Further heterogeneity tests suggest that the effect of dual pilot policy is more pronounced among private firms, those with higher financing constraints, in more market-oriented regions, and those not subject to green credit restrictions. Importantly, the dual pilot policy exhibits stronger effects than either policy implemented in isolation, enhancing enduring market performance while showing limited short-term impact. These findings offer factual supports for the effectiveness of integrated environmental governance and provide a valuable basis for future sustainable policy coordination.
Suggested Citation
Zhang, Zicheng & Chen, Shi & Huang, Yixiong, 2025.
"How the dual pilot policy impacts corporate low-carbon transition: Evidence from energy use rights and carbon emission rights trading in China,"
Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 661-686.
Handle:
RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:88:y:2025:i:c:p:661-686
DOI: 10.1016/j.eap.2025.09.012
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:88:y:2025:i:c:p:661-686. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/economic-analysis-and-policy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.