Author
Listed:
- Tao, Weiliang
- Sachin, Kumar Mangla
- Weng, Shimei
- Deng, Xiangzheng
- Chen, Xue-Li
- Song, Malin
Abstract
As global energy demand continues to rise and geopolitical uncertainties intensify, developing renewable energy has emerged as a crucial strategic approach to enhancing national and regional energy security. Adopting an energy saving and emission reduction fiscal policy is a vital strategy to accelerate green transformation and promote renewable energy utilization. However, empirical examination of the impact of this type of policy on renewable energy development is nonexistent. This study is the first to systematically investigate how this policy influences renewable energy development using a staggered difference-in-differences model. The results showed that the pilot demonstration cities had significant advantages in promoting renewable energy development. Simultaneously, this positive effect can be achieved by enhancing government environmental concern, accelerating industrial squeeze, and increasing renewable energy investment. Interestingly, fiscal pressure and pressure from China’s “dual carbon” strategy both limited and enhanced policy effectiveness, respectively. Additionally, the impact of the pilot policy varied significantly based on geographical location, city size, energy endowment, and capacity utilization. Moreover, the construction of demonstration cities yielded positive environmental dividends. This study offers a valuable reference for accelerating energy transition and achieving “dual carbon” goals.
Suggested Citation
Tao, Weiliang & Sachin, Kumar Mangla & Weng, Shimei & Deng, Xiangzheng & Chen, Xue-Li & Song, Malin, 2025.
"Exploring the impact of energy saving and emission reduction fiscal policy on renewable energy development: Evidence from China,"
Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 463-483.
Handle:
RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:87:y:2025:i:c:p:463-483
DOI: 10.1016/j.eap.2025.06.018
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:87:y:2025:i:c:p:463-483. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/economic-analysis-and-policy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.