Author
Listed:
- Li, Xinran
- Cheng, Sheng
- Liang, Ruibin
- Tang, Tao
Abstract
Economic policy uncertainty has intensified volatility in energy markets and facilitated the spread of cross-market risks. Notably, metals play an indispensable role as a critical underpinning of clean energy technologies throughout the energy transition process. Given this, we employ the time-varying parameter vector autoregressive (TVP-VAR) connectedness decomposition method to calculate spillover effects within and across the fossil energy, clean energy, and energy metal markets (the FCM system). On this basis, we apply the wavelet coherence model to examine the lead-lag relationship of monetary policy uncertainty (MPU), trade policy uncertainty (TPU) and fiscal policy uncertainty (FPU) on spillovers. Finally, we develop portfolio strategies for the FCM system under different uncertainty regimes. Our main findings are as follows. First, internal (within-market) and external (cross-market) spillover effects accounted for 29.37 % and 23.42 % respectively. Renewable energy developers and operators emerge as the largest net transmitter, while cobalt is the largest net receiver. Additionally, spillovers exhibit significant time-varying characteristics and heightened sensitivity during crisis periods. Second, MPU, TPU and FPU amplify or dampen both internal and external risk spillovers, particularly in the medium to long term, with the clean energy market bing more sensitive to these uncertainties. Third, investors should overweight assets linked to renewable-energy developers and operators and dynamically adjust holdings of energy metals such as cobalt, copper, and aluminum in response to policy uncertainty conditions to achieve optimal risk diversification. Our findings provide insights for countries to improve institutional mechanisms and policy measures for the low-carbon energy transition.
Suggested Citation
Li, Xinran & Cheng, Sheng & Liang, Ruibin & Tang, Tao, 2025.
"Internal and external risk spillovers in energy and metal markets: the role of economic policy uncertainties,"
Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 1742-1762.
Handle:
RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:87:y:2025:i:c:p:1742-1762
DOI: 10.1016/j.eap.2025.07.034
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
More about this item
Keywords
;
;
;
;
;
JEL classification:
- Q43 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Energy and the Macroeconomy
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:87:y:2025:i:c:p:1742-1762. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/economic-analysis-and-policy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.