Author
Listed:
- Wenling, Zeng
- Lu, Dong
- Shouguo, Zhao
Abstract
Energy security (ES) is the cornerstone of a stable and efficient economic operation. Its coordination with energy efficiency (EE) is the key to solving the contradictions in the current "energy-environment-economy" system. Based on this, this paper utilizes China's provincial panel data from 2000 to 2022 to systematically evaluate the effects of ES and government intervention on EE and to identify the regulatory mechanism between the two. The study found a significant negative correlation between ES and EE, indicating that under certain conditions, improving ES may hinder efficiency growth. Government intervention plays a significant buffering role in this process, helping to achieve the coordination of ES and EE. Mechanism analysis reveals that ES indirectly hinders EE through the solidification of industrial structures and the crowding-out effect of green technology innovation. Heterogeneity analysis further reveals that the adverse effect of ES is relatively weak in the eastern region, where an optimized energy structure and improved institutional environment are present.In contrast, the central and western regions, as well as resource-rich regions, are constrained by resource dependence and path dependence, resulting in more significant efficiency inhibition. However, government intervention can effectively alleviate this adverse effect. This study provides theoretical support and policy inspiration for transforming ES into a positive force that promotes sustainable economic development through government intervention tailored to local conditions, as well as for developing economies to coordinate security and efficiency goals during the energy transformation process.
Suggested Citation
Wenling, Zeng & Lu, Dong & Shouguo, Zhao, 2025.
"The impact of energy security on energy efficiency: based on the moderating effect of government intervention,"
Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 1653-1669.
Handle:
RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:87:y:2025:i:c:p:1653-1669
DOI: 10.1016/j.eap.2025.07.037
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:87:y:2025:i:c:p:1653-1669. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/economic-analysis-and-policy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.