IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecanpo/v86y2025icp839-857.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the impact of special additional deductions policy on urban-rural household vulnerability: Insights from China Family Panel Studies

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Yali
  • Marquez, Ronald
  • Xie, Luhua
  • Li, Xinyi

Abstract

Despite the eradication of absolute poverty in China post-2020, many Chinese households remain vulnerable to multidimensional poverty. This study uses micro-panel data from the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS) from 2016 to 2020 to evaluate the effects of the special additional deduction policy (SADP) on household vulnerability to income and health poverty. Employing a multi-vulnerability to poverty model, the study quantifies these vulnerabilities and applies a non-linear logistic continuous difference-in-differences model to assess the effectiveness of the SADP. The 2019 implementation of SADP for personal income tax serves as a quasi-natural experiment. Findings indicate that the SADP significantly reduces household vulnerability to income and health poverty by alleviating tax burdens and enhancing income standards and consumption structures. However, the policy's impact varies across urban and rural areas, income groups, and access to public medical insurance, with more pronounced effects observed in medium and north-east China compared to eastern and western regions. This study underscores the need for optimizing the income redistribution mechanism and considering regional and individual differences in SADP implementation. Enhancing the alignment between taxation and social security measures can further strengthen the government's fiscal redistribution efforts, promoting equity and reducing household vulnerability.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Yali & Marquez, Ronald & Xie, Luhua & Li, Xinyi, 2025. "Evaluating the impact of special additional deductions policy on urban-rural household vulnerability: Insights from China Family Panel Studies," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 839-857.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:86:y:2025:i:c:p:839-857
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eap.2025.04.008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0313592625001407
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eap.2025.04.008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:86:y:2025:i:c:p:839-857. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/economic-analysis-and-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.