IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecanpo/v86y2025icp731-748.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of accountability for illegal operation and investment on investment efficiency of SOEs: Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Li
  • Qin, Dongqian
  • Pan, Lu

Abstract

The establishment of an accountability system is a significant step in China's ongoing reform of state-owned enterprises (SOEs). This study uses a sample of A-share Chinese listed firms (excluding financial and cultural firms) from 2013 to 2022, employing a difference-in-differences method to examine the impact of accountability system reform on the investment efficiency of SOEs. The findings indicate that accountability for illegal operation and investment (AIOI) substantially enhances the investment efficiency of SOEs, particularly for firms previously characterized by over-investment. Further analysis reveals that the primary mechanisms through which AIOI influences the investment efficiency of SOEs are the reduction of agency costs and the improvement of information communication quality. Additionally, the study finds that the positive impact of AIOI on investment efficiency is more pronounced in SOEs situated in non-western regions, regions with lower levels of corruption, during the initial years of an executive's tenure, and in SOEs where executives are close to retirement. These results underscore the pivotal role of AIOI in boosting the investment efficiency of SOEs and suggest that it encourages the government to take a more active role in supervising and guiding SOEs’ activities.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Li & Qin, Dongqian & Pan, Lu, 2025. "The impact of accountability for illegal operation and investment on investment efficiency of SOEs: Evidence from China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 731-748.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:86:y:2025:i:c:p:731-748
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eap.2025.04.007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0313592625001377
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eap.2025.04.007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:86:y:2025:i:c:p:731-748. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/economic-analysis-and-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.