IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecanpo/v86y2025icp380-398.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do industrial robots bring happiness? The moderating role of public trust

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Wen
  • Han, Wang-Zhe

Abstract

Recent research has extensively discussed both the positive and negative effects of industrial robots on economic and social development, but it remains an open question as to what effects these robots have on individuals’ happiness. This study matches individual panel data reported by a Chinese family group survey with regional-level data on the intensity of industrial robot applications and finds that industrial robots impair individuals’ happiness. This negative impact is more pronounced among individuals not involved in political or labor organizations, low-income groups, those facing low job security, and regions with high unemployment rates and inadequate unemployment protection. We then discuss the factors that may affect the negative effect of industrial robots on happiness from the perspective of public trust. We find that high self-trust, political trust, and social trust effectively alleviate the negative impact of industrial robots on happiness. In contrast, high occupational trust exacerbates this effect. This paper expands the study of the social impact of technological progress from the economic level to the levels of psychological and social well-being, providing new perspectives on the interaction between technological advancements and people's livelihoods.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Wen & Han, Wang-Zhe, 2025. "Do industrial robots bring happiness? The moderating role of public trust," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 380-398.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:86:y:2025:i:c:p:380-398
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eap.2025.03.033
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0313592625001092
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eap.2025.03.033?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:86:y:2025:i:c:p:380-398. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/economic-analysis-and-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.