IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecanpo/v86y2025icp288-303.html

Does government deleveraging affect corporate cost stickiness?

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Li
  • Tang, Yajun
  • Shu, Haicheng
  • Zhang, Ziqing

Abstract

Asymmetric cost behavior is a significant topic within the field of manage- ment accounting. Adjustments in macroeconomic policies inevitably exert profound influences on corporate management decisions, potentially leading to changes in cost behavior. This paper, grounded in the macroeconomic backdrop of China's deleveraging policy, delves into the potential impact of this policy on cost stickiness at the micro-enterprise level. The study reveals that the enforced implementation of the deleveraging policy has, to some extent, inhibited cost stickiness in enterprises. Variations in the methods and degrees of deleveraging adopted by enterprises result in differing levels of inhibition on cost stickiness. Compared to equity-increasing deleverag- ing, debt-reducing deleveraging demonstrates a more pronounced effect in mitigating cost stickiness. Furthermore, in the heterogeneity analysis, the inhibitory effect of the deleveraging policy on cost stickiness is particularly evident in enterprises with higher external financing dependence, those with- out well-established bank-enterprise relationships, and those subject to in- dustrial policy constraints. This research provides empirical validation and support for the anticipated motivational factors behind cost stickiness within the Chinese context, thereby expanding and deepening the understanding of how macroeconomic policies influence micro-enterprise behavior.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Li & Tang, Yajun & Shu, Haicheng & Zhang, Ziqing, 2025. "Does government deleveraging affect corporate cost stickiness?," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 288-303.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:86:y:2025:i:c:p:288-303
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eap.2025.03.029
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0313592625001031
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eap.2025.03.029?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dai, Jing & Hu, Nan & Huang, Rong & Yan, Yan, 2023. "How does credit risk affect cost management strategies? Evidence on the initiation of credit default swap and sticky cost behavior," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    2. Duchin, Ran & Ozbas, Oguzhan & Sensoy, Berk A., 2010. "Costly external finance, corporate investment, and the subprime mortgage credit crisis," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(3), pages 418-435, September.
    3. Kitching, Karen & Mashruwala, Raj & Pevzner, Mikhail, 2016. "Culture and Cost Stickiness: A Cross-country Study," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 51(3), pages 402-417.
    4. Eugenio Gaiotti & Andrea Generale, 2002. "Does Monetary Policy Have Asymmetric Effects? A Look at the Investment Decisions of Italian Firms," Giornale degli Economisti, GDE (Giornale degli Economisti e Annali di Economia), Bocconi University, vol. 61(1), pages 29-59, June.
    5. Martin Holzhacker & Ranjani Krishnan & Matthias D. Mahlendorf, 2015. "The Impact of Changes in Regulation on Cost Behavior," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(2), pages 534-566, June.
    6. Elif Sisli-Ciamarra, 2012. "Monitoring by Affiliated Bankers on Board of Directors: Evidence from Corporate Financing Outcomes," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 41(3), pages 665-702, September.
    7. Rajan, Raghuram G & Zingales, Luigi, 1998. "Financial Dependence and Growth," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 88(3), pages 559-586, June.
    8. Itay Kama & Dan Weiss, 2013. "Do Earnings Targets and Managerial Incentives Affect Sticky Costs?," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 51(1), pages 201-224, March.
    9. Mark C. Anderson & Rajiv D. Banker & Surya N. Janakiraman, 2003. "Are Selling, General, and Administrative Costs “Sticky”?," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(1), pages 47-63, March.
    10. Fazzari, Steven M & Hubbard, R Glenn & Petersen, Bruce C, 1988. "Investment, Financing Decisions, and Tax Policy," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 78(2), pages 200-205, May.
    11. Kim, Jeong-Bon & Zhou, Jie, 2023. "Cost stickiness and bank loan contracting," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    12. Ibrahim, Awad Elsayed Awad & Ali, Hesham & Aboelkheir, Heba, 2022. "Cost stickiness: A systematic literature review of 27 years of research and a future research agenda," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).
    13. Banker, Rajiv D. & Byzalov, Dmitri & Chen, Lei (Tony), 2013. "Employment protection legislation, adjustment costs and cross-country differences in cost behavior," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(1), pages 111-127.
    14. Clara Xiaoling Chen & Hai Lu & Theodore Sougiannis, 2012. "The Agency Problem, Corporate Governance, and the Asymmetrical Behavior of Selling, General, and Administrative Costs," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(1), pages 252-282, March.
    15. Byrd, Daniel T. & Mizruchi, Mark S., 2005. "Bankers on the board and the debt ratio of firms," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 11(1-2), pages 129-173, March.
    16. Ronny Prabowo & Reggy Hooghiemstra & Paula Van Veen-Dirks, 2018. "State Ownership, Socio-political Factors, and Labor Cost Stickiness," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(4), pages 771-796, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Tongxia & Lu, Chun & Xu, Lei, 2025. "Access to finance and cost stickiness: Evidence from anti-recharacterization laws," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    2. Chalevas, Constantinos & Ntounis, Dimitrios & Vlismas, Orestes, 2025. "The effect of cost asymmetry on future tax avoidance," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    3. Ibrahim, Awad Elsayed Awad & Ali, Hesham & Aboelkheir, Heba, 2022. "Cost stickiness: A systematic literature review of 27 years of research and a future research agenda," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).
    4. Naoum, Vasilios-Christos & Ntounis, Dimitrios & Papanastasopoulos, Georgios & Vlismas, Orestes, 2023. "Asymmetric cost behavior: Theory, meta-analysis, and implications," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    5. Tingyong Zhong & Fangcheng Sun & Haiyan Zhou & Jeoung Yul Lee, 2020. "Business Strategy, State-Owned Equity and Cost Stickiness: Evidence from Chinese Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-21, March.
    6. Chen, Yan & Du, Kerui & Sun, Ruiqi & Wang, Tiantian, 2025. "Can strict environmental regulation reduce firm cost stickiness? Evidence from the new environmental protection law in China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    7. Cristiana Cattaneo & Gaia Bassani, 2020. "Sticky costs: le determinanti e le sfide per manager e accademici," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2020(Suppl. 1), pages 103-126.
    8. Voshaar, Johannes & Loy, Thomas R. & Zimmermann, Jochen, 2025. "The impact of lobbying on managerial short-term resource adjustment decisions," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 57(3).
    9. Mabel D. Costa & Ahsan Habib & Md. Borhan Uddin Bhuiyan, 2021. "Financial constraints and asymmetric cost behavior," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 32(1), pages 33-83, March.
    10. Josep M. Argilés-Bosch & Josep Garcia-Blandón & Diego Ravenda, 2023. "Cost behavior in e-commerce firms," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 2101-2134, December.
    11. Zhaoyang Gu & Song Tang & Donghui Wu, 2020. "The Political Economy of Labor Employment Decisions: Evidence from China," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(10), pages 4703-4725, October.
    12. Christian Riegler & Katrin Weiskirchner-Merten, 2021. "Research note: an analytical perspective on market decisions and asymmetric cost behavior," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 991-1005, May.
    13. Oh, Seungbin & Choi, Ahrum, 2025. "How does divergence of control and cash-flow rights influence cost stickiness?," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 57(3).
    14. Hendijani Zadeh, Mohammad & Jalali, Zahra, 2024. "Do options trading activities affect underlying firms' asymmetric cost behavior?," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    15. Gu, Yuqi & Ouyang, Bo, 2024. "Debt covenant violations and corporate cost management," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    16. Wei Huang & Jaehyeon Kim, 2020. "Linguistically Induced Time Perception and Asymmetric Cost Behavior," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 60(5), pages 755-785, October.
    17. Peng Liang & Hasan Cavusoglu & Nan Hu, 2023. "Customers’ managerial expectations and suppliers’ asymmetric cost management," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(6), pages 1975-1993, June.
    18. Yan, Suyan & Tong, Chang & Liu, Qiliang, 2025. "Housing prices and labor cost stickiness: Evidence from China," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(1).
    19. James N Cannon & Bingbing Hu & Jay Junghun Lee & Daoguang Yang, 2020. "The effect of international takeover laws on corporate resource adjustments: Market discipline and/or managerial myopia?," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 51(9), pages 1443-1477, December.
    20. Xinyi Du & Kangqi Jiang & Xian Zheng, 2024. "Reducing asymmetric cost behaviors: Evidence from digital innovation," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-18, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:86:y:2025:i:c:p:288-303. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/economic-analysis-and-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.