IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecanpo/v39y2009i3p443-454.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparing Batsmen Across Different Eras: The Ends of the Distribution Justifying the Means

Author

Listed:
  • H. Shelton Brown, III

    (University of Texas School of Public Health, 313 East 12th Street, Austin, TX 78701, U.S.A.)

Abstract

The debate over the quality of modern batsmanship in cricket parallels the debate over the disappearance of the 0.400 hitter in baseball. This paper shows that the best batting averages in cricket, which are in the right tail of the distribution of all batting averages, have declined. This does not imply poorer batting skills. The batting average actually measures batting skill in relation to bowling and fielding skills, the latter of which, it is argued, have improved over time. Therefore, by mistakenly interpreting the batting average as an absolute measure of batsmanship, cricket experts and fans under-appreciate the skill of modern batsmen. The paper attempts to make a meaningful comparison of modern batsmen to non-modern batsmen through use of the Z transformation. Both decadal standard deviations and coefficients of variation reveal wider variations in batting averages in previous decades, especially the 1940’s.

Suggested Citation

  • H. Shelton Brown, III, 2009. "Comparing Batsmen Across Different Eras: The Ends of the Distribution Justifying the Means," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 443-454, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v39:y:2009:i:3:p:443-454
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0313592609500380
    File Function: full text
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Cricket; history; distribution;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L83 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services - - - Sports; Gambling; Restaurants; Recreation; Tourism

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v39:y:2009:i:3:p:443-454. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/economic-analysis-and-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.